Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Estelle Barrett Estelle Barrett (= 1×)
peers
Barbara Bolt
Countries citing papers authored by Estelle Barrett
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Estelle Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estelle Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estelle Barrett more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Estelle Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Estelle Barrett. The network helps show where Estelle Barrett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Estelle Barrett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Estelle Barrett.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Estelle Barrett based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Estelle Barrett. Estelle Barrett is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McPherson, Maggie, et al.. (2016). iDARE Creative arts research approaches to ethics: new ways to address situated practices in action. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 98–105.2 indexed citations
Barrett, Estelle. (2015). Memory image matter: trauma and acts of unforgetting. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 16. 1–1.2 indexed citations
5.
Barrett, Estelle & Barbara Bolt. (2014). Material Inventions: Applying Creative Arts Research. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).2 indexed citations
Barrett, Estelle. (2010). Aesthetic experience and innovation in practice–led research. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–9.
11.
Barrett, Estelle. (2010). Kristeva Reframed: Interpreting Key Thinkers for the Arts. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).5 indexed citations
12.
Barrett, Estelle. (2009). Memory, photography, and the politics of abuse : the ambiguous nature of photography. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1. 16–30.
13.
Barrett, Estelle. (2009). Kristevan aesthetics, performativity and the production of situated knowledge. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).1 indexed citations
14.
Barrett, Estelle. (2008). Audiences and public : when cultural engagement matters for the public sphere. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 10(2). 80–81.2 indexed citations
Barrett, Estelle. (2006). Foucault's 'what is an author': towards a critical discourse of practice as research. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).2 indexed citations
17.
Barrett, Estelle. (2005). Creative arts practice, creative industries : method and process as cultural capital. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–13.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.