Estefanía Argente
- Materials Chemistry
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Catalysis top 5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vicente BottiJosé M. SerraAvelino CormaSoledad ValeroNatalia CriadoVicente JuliánManuel MolinerPedro Serna
- Topics
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (24 papers)Business Process Modeling and Analysis (11 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomSri Lanka
In The Last Decade
Estefanía Argente
44 papers receiving 633 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Materials Chemistry 278
- Artificial Intelligence 238
- Catalysis 178
- Inorganic Chemistry 107
- Management Science and Operations Research 63
Countries citing papers authored by Estefanía Argente
This map shows the geographic impact of Estefanía Argente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estefanía Argente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estefanía Argente more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Estefanía Argente
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Estefanía Argente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Estefanía Argente. The network helps show where Estefanía Argente may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Estefanía Argente
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Estefanía Argente. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Estefanía Argente based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Estefanía Argente. Estefanía Argente is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | FORMALIZING VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS | 9 |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Service oriented MAS: an open architecture | 19 |
| 12 | Service-Oriented Framework for Virtual Organizations. | 4 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About Estefanía Argente
Estefanía Argente is a scholar working on Catalysis, Management Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 44 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (24 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (11 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (178 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (107 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (238 citations). Estefanía Argente has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Vicente Botti, José M. Serra, Avelino Corma, Soledad Valero, Natalia Criado, Vicente Julián, Manuel Moliner, Pedro Serna, Pablo Noriega and Adriana Giret. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Catalysis, Chemical Engineering Science and Catalysis Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.