Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Erving Goffman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Erving Goffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erving Goffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erving Goffman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erving Goffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erving Goffman. The network helps show where Erving Goffman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erving Goffman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erving Goffman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erving Goffman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erving Goffman. Erving Goffman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goffman, Erving. (2013). De como calmar al primo. Algunos aspectos de la adaptacion al fracaso. Digitum: Institutional Repository of the University of Murcia (University of Murcia). 415–438.
2.
Konecki, Krzysztof T., et al.. (2012). "Spotkania. Dwa studia z socjologii interakcji", Erving Goffman, tł. Paweł Tomanek, Kraków 2010 : [recenzja].3 indexed citations
3.
Goffman, Erving. (2002). The Anchoring of Activity. 2(2). 10–53.2 indexed citations
Goffman, Erving, et al.. (1991). Les cadres de l'expérience. Éditions de Minuit eBooks.123 indexed citations
6.
Goffman, Erving, et al.. (1991). Interaktionsrituale: über Verhalten in direkter Kommunikation. Suhrkamp eBooks.33 indexed citations
7.
Goffman, Erving & Hermann Vetter. (1989). Rahmen-Analyse : ein Versuch über die Organisation von Alltagserfahrungen. Suhrkamp eBooks.80 indexed citations
Goffman, Erving & Nils Thomas Lindquist. (1977). Asyle : über die soziale Situation psychiatrischer Patienten und anderer Insassen. Suhrkamp eBooks.96 indexed citations
Goffman, Erving & Rolf Wiggershaus. (1974). Das Individuum im öffentlichen Austausch : Mikrostudien zur öffentlichen Ordnung. Suhrkamp eBooks.25 indexed citations
14.
Goffman, Erving & Alain Kihm. (1974). Les rites d'interaction. Éditions de Minuit eBooks.334 indexed citations
15.
Goffman, Erving & Alain Kihm. (1973). Les relations en public. Éditions de Minuit eBooks.14 indexed citations
16.
Goffman, Erving. (1969). La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione.32 indexed citations
17.
Goffman, Erving, et al.. (1968). Asiles : études sur la condition sociale des malades mentaux et autres reclus.113 indexed citations
18.
Goffman, Erving. (1964). The Neglected Situation. American Anthropologist. 66(6_PART2). 133–136.470 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Sutton‐Smith, Brian & Erving Goffman. (1964). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. The American Journal of Psychology. 77(2). 347–347.1021 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Goffman, Erving. (1959). The Moral Career of the Mental Patient. Psychiatry. 22(2). 123–142.306 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
You can learn more about the impact of Erving Goffman by visiting their Pantheon page.