Ernest Frederick Gale
About
In The Last Decade
Ernest Frederick Gale
6 papers receiving 129 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Molecular Biology 75
- Infectious Diseases 34
- Biochemistry 24
- Pharmacology 13
- Epidemiology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Ernest Frederick Gale
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest Frederick Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest Frederick Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest Frederick Gale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernest Frederick Gale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest Frederick Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest Frederick Gale. The network helps show where Ernest Frederick Gale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernest Frederick Gale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernest Frederick Gale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernest Frederick Gale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernest Frederick Gale. Ernest Frederick Gale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 79 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.