Erika Nesvold
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Geophysics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Aerospace Engineering
- Co-authors
- Marc J. KuchnerMargaret PanAki RobergeA. Meredith HughesHanno ReinChristopher C. StarkSimón CasassusDavid R. Rodriguez
- Topics
- Astro and Planetary Science (11 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (9 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyNature Reviews Materials
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChile
In The Last Decade
Erika Nesvold
13 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 239
- Instrumentation 26
- Geophysics 10
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 9
- Aerospace Engineering 7
Countries citing papers authored by Erika Nesvold
This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Nesvold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Nesvold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Nesvold more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erika Nesvold
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Nesvold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Nesvold. The network helps show where Erika Nesvold may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erika Nesvold
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erika Nesvold. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erika Nesvold based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erika Nesvold. Erika Nesvold is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | APOCENTER GLOW IN ECCENTRIC DEBRIS DISKS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FOMALHAUT AND | 36 |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | A SMACK Model of Colliding Planetesimals and Dust in the $\beta$ Pictoris Debris Disk: Thermal Radiation and Scattered Light | 0 |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 25 |
About Erika Nesvold
Erika Nesvold is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (239 citations), Instrumentation (26 citations) and Geophysics (10 citations). Erika Nesvold has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Marc J. Kuchner, Margaret Pan, Aki Roberge, A. Meredith Hughes, Hanno Rein, Christopher C. Stark, Simón Casassus, David R. Rodriguez, Sebastián Pérez and Grant M. Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Nature Reviews Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.