D. M. Watson

9.4k total citations
125 papers, 4.2k citations indexed

About

D. M. Watson is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, D. M. Watson has authored 125 papers receiving a total of 4.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 96 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 40 papers in Spectroscopy and 19 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in D. M. Watson's work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (85 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (58 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (46 papers). D. M. Watson is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (85 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (58 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (46 papers). D. M. Watson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and France. D. M. Watson's co-authors include W. J. Forrest, Elise Furlan, Nuria Calvet, Paola D’Alessio, Lee Hartmann, B. Sargent, Omar S. Al-Kadi, C. H. Townes, P. Manoj and Joan Najita and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Applied Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

D. M. Watson

119 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. M. Watson United States 39 3.5k 1.2k 397 321 228 125 4.2k
A. Scholz United Kingdom 32 2.1k 0.6× 513 0.4× 476 1.2× 81 0.3× 81 0.4× 134 2.9k
Adolf N. Witt United States 32 2.9k 0.8× 292 0.2× 403 1.0× 517 1.6× 101 0.4× 114 3.4k
R. C. Puetter United States 24 1.7k 0.5× 228 0.2× 197 0.5× 208 0.6× 70 0.3× 164 2.2k
Russ R. Laher United States 26 1.8k 0.5× 222 0.2× 372 0.9× 215 0.7× 467 2.0× 108 2.7k
N. P. Carleton United States 23 1.1k 0.3× 222 0.2× 406 1.0× 307 1.0× 155 0.7× 96 1.6k
A. H. Barrett United States 23 862 0.2× 352 0.3× 244 0.6× 324 1.0× 79 0.3× 102 1.5k
A. Moretti Italy 28 1.6k 0.5× 760 0.6× 610 1.5× 107 0.3× 655 2.9× 194 2.6k
M. J. Reid United States 52 8.3k 2.4× 1.8k 1.5× 415 1.0× 785 2.4× 52 0.2× 271 8.9k
C. Dominik Netherlands 47 6.7k 1.9× 2.1k 1.7× 404 1.0× 652 2.0× 77 0.3× 193 7.5k
C. J. Eyles United Kingdom 24 3.1k 0.9× 196 0.2× 332 0.8× 123 0.4× 77 0.3× 60 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by D. M. Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. M. Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. M. Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. M. Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. M. Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. M. Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. M. Watson. The network helps show where D. M. Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. M. Watson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. M. Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. M. Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. M. Watson. D. M. Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Green, Joel D., K. M. Pontoppidan, Megan Reiter, et al.. (2024). Why Are (Almost) All the Protostellar Outflows Aligned in Serpens Main?. The Astrophysical Journal. 972(1). 5–5. 4 indexed citations
2.
Worthen, Kadin, Christine Chen, David R. Law, et al.. (2024). MIRI MRS Observations of β Pictoris. I. The Inner Dust, the Planet, and the Gas. The Astrophysical Journal. 964(2). 168–168. 12 indexed citations
3.
Karlsen, Junita Diana, Jesse Senko, Valentina Melli, et al.. (2024). Guidelines for Evaluating Artificial Light to Mitigate Unwanted Fisheries Bycatch. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 32(4). 612–656. 5 indexed citations
4.
Chen, Christine, Kadin Worthen, David R. Law, et al.. (2024). MIRI MRS Observations of Beta Pictoris. II. The Spectroscopic Case for a Recent Giant Collision. The Astrophysical Journal. 973(2). 139–139. 4 indexed citations
5.
Pokhrel, Riwaj, S. T. Megeath, Robert Gutermuth, et al.. (2023). Extension of HOPS out to 500 pc (eHOPS). I. Identification and Modeling of Protostars in the Aquila Molecular Clouds*. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 266(2). 32–32. 19 indexed citations
6.
Quillen, Alice C., et al.. (2023). HOPS 361-C’s Jet Decelerating and Precessing through NGC 2071 IR. The Astrophysical Journal. 948(1). 39–39.
7.
Watson, D. M., et al.. (2023). Case Study Comparing ROC and PRC Curves for Imbalanced Data. Annual Conference of the PHM Society. 15(1). 2 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Christine, B. A. Sargent, D. M. Watson, et al.. (2022). Trends in Silicates in the β Pictoris Disk. The Astrophysical Journal. 933(1). 54–54. 10 indexed citations
9.
Watson, D. M., et al.. (2022). Riding the elevator to extinction: Disjunct arctic-alpine plants of open habitats decline as their more competitive neighbours expand. Biological Conservation. 272. 109620–109620. 18 indexed citations
10.
Habel, Nolan, S. T. Megeath, William J. Fischer, et al.. (2021). An HST Survey of Protostellar Outflow Cavities: Does Feedback Clear Envelopes?. The Astrophysical Journal. 911(2). 153–153. 20 indexed citations
11.
Fischer, William J., S. T. Megeath, Elise Furlan, et al.. (2017). The Herschel Orion Protostar Survey: Luminosity and Envelope Evolution. The Astrophysical Journal. 840(2). 69–69. 48 indexed citations
12.
Manoj, P., Joel D. Green, S. T. Megeath, et al.. (2016). THE EVOLUTION OF FAR-INFRARED CO EMISSION FROM PROTOSTARS. The Astrophysical Journal. 831(1). 69–69. 9 indexed citations
13.
Glauser, Adrian M., M. Güdel, D. M. Watson, et al.. (2009). Dust amorphization in protoplanetary disks. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 508(1). 247–257. 17 indexed citations
14.
Al-Kadi, Omar S. & D. M. Watson. (2008). Texture Analysis of Aggressive and Nonaggressive Lung Tumor CE CT Images. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 55(7). 1822–1830. 202 indexed citations
15.
Watson, D. M., C. J. Bohac, W. J. Forrest, et al.. (2007). The development of a protoplanetary disk from its natal envelope. Nature. 448(7157). 1026–1028. 43 indexed citations
16.
Sicilia‐Aguilar, A., C. J. Bohac, J. Bouwman, et al.. (2006). Dust and Gas in Planet-Forming Disks: Tracing the Grains in Transitional and Evolved Systems. 30523. 1 indexed citations
17.
Calvet, Nuria, Paola D’Alessio, D. M. Watson, et al.. (2005). Disks in Transition in the Taurus Population: Spitzer IRS Spectra of GM Aurigae and DM Tauri. The Astrophysical Journal. 630(2). L185–L188. 231 indexed citations
18.
Greenhouse, Matthew A., Shobita Satyapal, C. E. Woodward, et al.. (1997). Infrared Fabry‐Perot Imaging of M82 [Feii] Emission. II. Tracing Extragalactic Supernova Remnants. The Astrophysical Journal. 476(1). 105–112. 19 indexed citations
19.
Watson, D. M., et al.. (1996). So Johnny's Been Bad. What Else Is New?.. Principal. 75(4). 27–28. 1 indexed citations
20.
Watson, D. M., et al.. (1994). Temperature-dependent compensation and optical quenching by thermal oxygen donors in germanium. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 49(23). 16361–16366. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026