Erika Hult

410 citations
11 papers · 285 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Erika Hult

9 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Erika Hult
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 214
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 32
  • Materials Chemistry 110
  • Condensed Matter Physics 20
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 20
Replace Henrik Rydberg with:
Henrik Rydberg Sweden
Barthélémy Pradines France
Bradley P. Dinte Australia
Vincent L. Lignères United States
J. N. Teixeira Rabelo Brazil
G. Leslie Oliver United States
Beatriz G. del Rio Spain
Klaus Maschke Switzerland
Shen Li China
Felix Hummel Austria
Erika Hult relative to Henrik Rydberg Sweden Henrik Rydberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Henrik Rydberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erika Hult

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Hult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Hult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Hult more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erika Hult

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Hult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Hult. The network helps show where Erika Hult may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Erika Hult, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erika Hult Line = papers co-authored together Erika Hult links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199699
2 199976
3 200146
4 199827
5 199714
6 201310
7 19987
8 19985
9
Analyzing the cost of complying to the ECSS standards for software development
20101
10
Evolving the ECSS Standards and their Use: Experience Based on Industrial Case Studies
20090
11
Optimizing Verification and Validation Activities for Software in the Space Industry
20100

About Erika Hult

Erika Hult is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Software, having authored 11 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (2 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (2 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (2 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper), Software System Performance and Reliability (1 paper) and Software Engineering and Design Patterns (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (214 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (32 citations), Materials Chemistry (110 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (20 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (20 citations). Erika Hult has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bengt I. Lundqvist, David C. Langreth, Ylva Andersson, Henrik Rydberg, Jan Rossmeisl, Per Hyldgaard, A. Kiejna, P. Apell, Robert Feldt and Miroslaw Staron. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Surface Science, Solid State Communications, Physical Review Letters and Progress in Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact