Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw
- Oceanography top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eric KunzeLibe WashburnMark A. BrzezinskiRichard W. SternbergB. L. MullenbachA. S. OgstonA. LeydeckerDavid A. Siegel
- Topics
- Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (16 papers)Marine and coastal ecosystems (11 papers)Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresGeophysical Research LettersLimnology and Oceanography
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw
20 papers receiving 743 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Oceanography 672
- Atmospheric Science 234
- Global and Planetary Change 180
- Earth-Surface Processes 165
- Ecology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw. The network helps show where Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw. Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 100 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 96 | |
| 17 | 79 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw
Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw is a scholar working on Oceanography, Earth-Surface Processes and Atmospheric Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (16 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (11 papers) and Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (672 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (165 citations) and Atmospheric Science (234 citations). Erika E. McPhee‐Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric Kunze, Libe Washburn, Mark A. Brzezinski, Richard W. Sternberg, B. L. Mullenbach, A. S. Ogston, A. Leydecker, David A. Siegel, John M. Mélack and Janice L. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters and Limnology and Oceanography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.