Erik Riiskjær

568 total citations
21 papers, 405 citations indexed

About

Erik Riiskjær is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Erik Riiskjær has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 405 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Health Information Management and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Erik Riiskjær's work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers). Erik Riiskjær is often cited by papers focused on Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers). Erik Riiskjær collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Canada. Erik Riiskjær's co-authors include Jette Ammentorp, Poul‐Erik Kofoed, Niels Henrik Hjøllund, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Kirsten Lomborg, Jørn Flohr Nielsen, Karin Biering, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Lars‐Olov Lundqvist and Agneta Schröder and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Patient Education and Counseling and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Erik Riiskjær

20 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erik Riiskjær Denmark 10 224 72 66 51 49 21 405
Unni Ringberg Norway 10 136 0.6× 70 1.0× 61 0.9× 83 1.6× 30 0.6× 17 371
Janet Sansoni Australia 10 226 1.0× 102 1.4× 72 1.1× 43 0.8× 34 0.7× 41 490
Andrew Knight Australia 12 194 0.9× 119 1.7× 68 1.0× 28 0.5× 53 1.1× 47 511
Rachel C Forcino United States 12 255 1.1× 102 1.4× 108 1.6× 41 0.8× 33 0.7× 32 380
Khic-Houy Prang Australia 14 184 0.8× 87 1.2× 105 1.6× 29 0.6× 76 1.6× 35 519
Bonnie O. Wong United States 9 164 0.7× 135 1.9× 61 0.9× 46 0.9× 27 0.6× 19 456
Sini Eloranta Finland 13 215 1.0× 81 1.1× 35 0.5× 50 1.0× 27 0.6× 39 466
Ashley Miller Canada 6 230 1.0× 63 0.9× 137 2.1× 24 0.5× 44 0.9× 12 449
Tully Saunders United States 9 278 1.2× 92 1.3× 76 1.2× 33 0.6× 21 0.4× 13 509
Diana Stilwell United States 5 346 1.5× 197 2.7× 75 1.1× 45 0.9× 27 0.6× 10 516

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Riiskjær

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Riiskjær's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Riiskjær with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Riiskjær more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Riiskjær

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Riiskjær. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Riiskjær. The network helps show where Erik Riiskjær may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erik Riiskjær

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erik Riiskjær. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erik Riiskjær based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erik Riiskjær. Erik Riiskjær is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen, et al.. (2020). Patient-reported outcome measures in the interaction between patient and clinician – a multi-perspective qualitative study. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 4(1). 3–3. 32 indexed citations
3.
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen, et al.. (2018). PRO-based follow-up as a means of self-management support – an interpretive description of the patient perspective. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2(1). 38–38. 45 indexed citations
4.
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen, et al.. (2018). Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective. BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 546–546. 28 indexed citations
5.
Schröder, Agneta, et al.. (2016). Patients’ views of the quality of Danish forensic psychiatric inpatient care. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 27(4). 551–568. 12 indexed citations
6.
Lundqvist, Lars‐Olov, et al.. (2014). Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Danish Adaptation of the Instrument Quality in Psychiatric Care-Forensic In-Patient Staff (QPC-FIPS). Open Journal of Nursing. 4(12). 878–885. 14 indexed citations
7.
Lundqvist, Lars‐Olov, et al.. (2014). A Danish Adaptation of the Quality in Psychiatric Care–Forensic In-Patient Questionnaire. Journal of Forensic Nursing. 10(3). 168–174. 21 indexed citations
8.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, Jørn Flohr Nielsen, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2014). Hospitals need to customise care according to patients' differing information-seeking behaviour.. PubMed. 61(2). A4787–A4787. 6 indexed citations
9.
Riiskjær, Erik, et al.. (2014). Hvordan kan patientrapporterede oplysninger (PRO) bruges i klinisk praksis? – belyst med udgangspunkt i fire forskellige konsultationsmodeller. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning. 4(3). 189–212. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hjøllund, Niels Henrik, et al.. (2014). Use of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures at Group and Patient Levels: Experiences From the Generic Integrated PRO System, WestChronic. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). e5–e5. 77 indexed citations
11.
Riiskjær, Erik, et al.. (2013). Positive patients' attitudes to prehospital care.. PubMed. 60(9). A4694–A4694. 1 indexed citations
12.
Nielsen, Jørn Flohr & Erik Riiskjær. (2013). From Patient Surveys to Organizational Change: Rational Change Processes and Institutional Forces. Journal of Change Management. 13(2). 179–205. 8 indexed citations
13.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2012). The value of open-ended questions in surveys on patient experience: number of comments and perceived usefulness from a hospital perspective. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 24(5). 509–516. 90 indexed citations
14.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, Jørn Flohr Nielsen, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2011). [The Internet influences the patient-physician relationship].. PubMed. 173(8). 572–7. 1 indexed citations
15.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2011). Semi-customizing patient surveys: linking results and organizational conditions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 23(3). 284–291. 3 indexed citations
16.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2011). Er otte ud af ti patienter tilfredse? – Om forståelse af patientkritik og anvendelse af åbne spørgsmål. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning. 1(2). 93–110. 4 indexed citations
17.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2011). Er 96 % af patienterne virkelig tilfredse med sundheds væsnet?. University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark). 2 indexed citations
18.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2010). [Patient satisfaction in relation to organizational conditions].. PubMed. 172(26). 1977–83. 1 indexed citations
19.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2010). [Can patient satisfaction change over time?].. PubMed. 172(26). 1967–71. 1 indexed citations
20.
Riiskjær, Erik, Jette Ammentorp, & Poul‐Erik Kofoed. (2010). [An evaluation of patient satisfaction surveys by heads of hospitals and departments].. PubMed. 172(26). 1972–7.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Unni Ringberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janet Sansoni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Knight Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel C Forcino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Khic-Houy Prang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bonnie O. Wong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sini Eloranta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ashley Miller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tully Saunders Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Diana Stilwell
Rankless by CCL
2026