Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development
2007500 citationsErick T. ByrdTourism Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Erick T. Byrd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erick T. Byrd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erick T. Byrd more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erick T. Byrd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erick T. Byrd. The network helps show where Erick T. Byrd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erick T. Byrd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erick T. Byrd.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erick T. Byrd based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erick T. Byrd. Erick T. Byrd is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Byrd, Erick T., et al.. (2021). Examining farm-to-table during the COVID-19 pandemic: Sustainability and the chef-farmer relationship in times of stress. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).2 indexed citations
Duffy, Lauren N., David Cárdenas, Charles Chancellor, & Erick T. Byrd. (2016). Examining barriers, motivations, and perceptions of women working in the tourism industry: Case study of Ayampe, Ecuador. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).1 indexed citations
7.
Byrd, Erick T., et al.. (2016). USING DECISION TREES TO IDENTIFY TOURISM STAKEHOLDERS BASED ON LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION IN TOURISM AND COMMUNITY POLITICAL ACTIVITIES. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst).1 indexed citations
Byrd, Erick T., et al.. (2009). Differences in Stakeholder Attitudes of Tourism development and the natural Environment.. Ereview of tourism research. 7(2). 39–51.19 indexed citations
Byrd, Erick T.. (2007). Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tourism Review. 62(2). 6–13.500 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Byrd, Erick T., et al.. (2006). Visitor Access to Non Motorized Boating Areas. Ereview of tourism research. 4(4). 92–98.1 indexed citations
Byrd, Erick T., et al.. (2004). Identifying tourism stakeholder groups based on support for sustainable tourism development and participation in tourism activities.16 indexed citations
19.
Byrd, Erick T.. (2003). An Analysis of Variables That Influence Stakeholder Participation and Support for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural North Carolina. NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries).11 indexed citations
20.
Sharik, Terry L., et al.. (2002). Student perceptions of a high-quality undergraduate experience: Implications for teaching and learning in natural resources. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 9(1). 2.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.