Erica Bello
About
In The Last Decade
Erica Bello
7 papers receiving 378 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Molecular Biology 259
- Genetics 120
- Physiology 115
- Neurology 44
- Oncology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Erica Bello
This map shows the geographic impact of Erica Bello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erica Bello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erica Bello more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erica Bello
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erica Bello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erica Bello. The network helps show where Erica Bello may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erica Bello
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erica Bello. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erica Bello based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erica Bello. Erica Bello is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer’s disease risk genes breakdown → | 280 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.