Eric Scharff

963 total citations
10 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Eric Scharff is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric Scharff has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 5 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 4 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Eric Scharff's work include Usability and User Interface Design (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers). Eric Scharff is often cited by papers focused on Usability and User Interface Design (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers). Eric Scharff collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Eric Scharff's co-authors include Gerhard Fischer, Hal Eden, Ernesto G. Arias, Andrew Gorman, Eva Hornecker and Shin’ichi Konomi and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Journal of Interactive Media in Education and Participatory Design Conference.

In The Last Decade

Eric Scharff

10 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Eric Scharff United States	7	258	105	99	82	82	10	562
Hal Eden United States	9	319 1.2×	151 1.4×	111 1.1×	93 1.1×	102 1.2×	18	735
Ernesto G. Arias United States	7	232 0.9×	107 1.0×	68 0.7×	71 0.9×	61 0.7×	14	521
Jonathan Ostwald United States	13	181 0.7×	112 1.1×	154 1.6×	77 0.9×	90 1.1×	21	632
William L. Verplank United States	9	584 2.3×	116 1.1×	112 1.1×	35 0.4×	63 0.8×	15	939
Peter Johnson United Kingdom	15	362 1.4×	58 0.6×	55 0.6×	46 0.6×	94 1.1×	48	895
Katja Battarbee Finland	8	648 2.5×	110 1.0×	55 0.6×	74 0.9×	41 0.5×	16	958
Joke Kort Netherlands	7	526 2.0×	49 0.5×	75 0.8×	71 0.9×	55 0.7×	14	841
Karen Tanenbaum Canada	13	541 2.1×	96 0.9×	102 1.0×	73 0.9×	53 0.6×	28	791
Raymond J. McCall United States	18	263 1.0×	272 2.6×	76 0.8×	129 1.6×	74 0.9×	42	1.0k
Dennis C. Neale United States	10	340 1.3×	32 0.3×	101 1.0×	49 0.6×	156 1.9×	19	744

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Scharff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Scharff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Scharff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Scharff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Scharff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Scharff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Scharff. The network helps show where Eric Scharff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Scharff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Scharff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Scharff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Scharff. Eric Scharff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Hornecker, Eva, Hal Eden, & Eric Scharff. (2002). In MY sistuation I would dislike THAAAT! - Role Play as Assessment Method Tools Supporting Participatory Planning. Participatory Design Conference. 243–247. 9 indexed citations

2.

Eden, Hal, Eric Scharff, & Eva Hornecker. (2002). Multilevel design and role play. 387–392. 31 indexed citations

3.

Eden, Hal, Eric Scharff, & Eva Hornecker. (2002). Multilevel design and role play. 1 indexed citations

4.

Scharff, Eric. (2002). Applying open source principles to collaborative learning environments. 499–499. 6 indexed citations

5.

Scharff, Eric & Gerhard Fischer. (2002). Open source: a conceptual framework for collaborative artifact and knowledge construction. 186–186. 11 indexed citations

6.

Arias, Ernesto G., Hal Eden, Gerhard Fischer, et al.. (2002). Supporting collaborative design by communities of interest with the envisionment and discovery collaboratory (EDC). 681–681. 1 indexed citations

7.

Arias, Ernesto G., Hal Eden, Gerhard Fischer, Andrew Gorman, & Eric Scharff. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 7(1). 84–113. 329 indexed citations

8.

Fischer, Gerhard & Eric Scharff. (2000). Meta-design. 396–405. 85 indexed citations

9.

Arias, Ernesto G., Hal Eden, Gerhard Fischer, Andrew Gorman, & Eric Scharff. (1999). Beyond access. 2–es. 17 indexed citations

10.

Fischer, Gerhard & Eric Scharff. (1998). Learning Technologies in Support of Self-Directed Learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 1998(2). 4–4. 72 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact