Eric L. Amazeen

1.8k total citations
54 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Eric L. Amazeen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric L. Amazeen has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eric L. Amazeen's work include Motor Control and Adaptation (32 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (15 papers). Eric L. Amazeen is often cited by papers focused on Motor Control and Adaptation (32 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (15 papers). Eric L. Amazeen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Eric L. Amazeen's co-authors include M. T. Turvey, Polemnia G. Amazeen, Paul Jaak Treffner, Peter J. Beek, Dagmar Sternad, Claudia Carello, Aaron D. Likens, Gregory Burton, Heidi Kloos and Pamela Hodges Kulinna and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Eric L. Amazeen

52 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eric L. Amazeen United States 25 1.1k 515 208 175 172 54 1.4k
Ludovic Marín France 24 997 0.9× 769 1.5× 167 0.8× 234 1.3× 188 1.1× 67 1.8k
John B. Shea United States 16 900 0.8× 374 0.7× 226 1.1× 578 3.3× 166 1.0× 48 1.5k
Paula Fitzpatrick United States 23 1.4k 1.3× 816 1.6× 129 0.6× 427 2.4× 166 1.0× 49 1.8k
Frank T. J. M. Zaal Netherlands 23 1.1k 1.0× 556 1.1× 276 1.3× 313 1.8× 55 0.3× 70 1.4k
Gilles Montagne France 22 818 0.8× 473 0.9× 206 1.0× 371 2.1× 45 0.3× 73 1.4k
Scott E. Kerick United States 18 914 0.9× 175 0.3× 136 0.7× 91 0.5× 152 0.9× 41 1.2k
David M. Jacobs Spain 20 843 0.8× 512 1.0× 58 0.3× 361 2.1× 158 0.9× 49 1.2k
Suvobrata Mitra United Kingdom 16 608 0.6× 214 0.4× 151 0.7× 110 0.6× 86 0.5× 37 973
Patrick Foo United States 10 450 0.4× 199 0.4× 60 0.3× 114 0.7× 100 0.6× 15 927
Michael Tombu Canada 13 1.3k 1.2× 306 0.6× 82 0.4× 164 0.9× 286 1.7× 18 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Eric L. Amazeen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric L. Amazeen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric L. Amazeen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric L. Amazeen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric L. Amazeen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric L. Amazeen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric L. Amazeen. The network helps show where Eric L. Amazeen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric L. Amazeen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric L. Amazeen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric L. Amazeen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric L. Amazeen. Eric L. Amazeen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2021). Heavy-tailed distributions in haptic perception of wielded rods. Experimental Brain Research. 239(7). 2331–2343.
3.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2019). Embodied Cognition in Performance: The Impact of Michael Chekhov’s Acting Exercises on Affect and Height Perception. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2277–2277. 6 indexed citations
4.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2017). Evaluating the contributions of muscle activity and joint kinematics to weight perception across multiple joints. Experimental Brain Research. 235(8). 2437–2448. 10 indexed citations
5.
Stylianou, Michalis, Hans van der Mars, Pamela Hodges Kulinna, et al.. (2016). Before-School Running/Walking Club and Student Physical Activity Levels: An Efficacy Study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 87(4). 342–353. 36 indexed citations
6.
Stylianou, Michalis, Pamela Hodges Kulinna, Hans van der Mars, et al.. (2016). Before-school running/walking club: Effects on student on-task behavior. Preventive Medicine Reports. 3. 196–202. 29 indexed citations
7.
Likens, Aaron D., et al.. (2015). Perceived heaviness in the context of Newton’s Second Law: Combined effects of muscle activity and lifting kinematics.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 42(3). 363–374. 12 indexed citations
8.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2014). Stabilizing perceptual-motor asymmetries during social coordination. Human Movement Science. 34. 91–108. 6 indexed citations
9.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2013). Congruency effects in interpersonal coordination.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 39(6). 1541–1556. 14 indexed citations
10.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2010). Motor Imagery May Incorporate Trial-to-Trial Error. Journal of Motor Behavior. 42(4). 241–256. 2 indexed citations
11.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2008). Sensory and perceptual interactions in weight perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 70(4). 647–657. 10 indexed citations
12.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2008). Using 1/f noise to examine planning and control in a discrete aiming task. Experimental Brain Research. 187(2). 303–319. 8 indexed citations
13.
Carello, Claudia, Jeffrey Kinsella-Shaw, Eric L. Amazeen, & M. T. Turvey. (2006). Peripheral neuropathy and object length perception by effortful (dynamic) touch: A case study. Neuroscience Letters. 405(3). 159–163. 29 indexed citations
14.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (2005). Psychophysical Test for the Independence of Perception and Action.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 31(1). 170–182. 18 indexed citations
15.
Glazebrook, Cheryl M., et al.. (2004). Perception-action and the M�ller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?. Experimental Brain Research. 160(1). 71–78. 24 indexed citations
16.
Oberle, Crystal D. & Eric L. Amazeen. (2003). Independence and separability of volume and mass in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics. 65(6). 831–843. 17 indexed citations
17.
Amazeen, Eric L.. (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 25(1). 102–119. 42 indexed citations
18.
Amazeen, Polemnia G., Eric L. Amazeen, & M. T. Turvey. (1998). Breaking the Reflectional Symmetry of Interlimb Coordination Dynamics. Journal of Motor Behavior. 30(3). 199–216. 29 indexed citations
19.
Burton, Gregory, et al.. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 24(1). 35–48. 12 indexed citations
20.
Amazeen, Eric L., et al.. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 22(1). 213–232. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026