Erhard Scholz
- Theoretical Computer Science top 1%
- History and Theory of Mathematics 10
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 6
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 4
- Relativity and Gravitational Theory 4
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 3
-
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research 2
-
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications 2
Erhard Scholz
24 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Theoretical Computer Science 83
- History and Philosophy of Science 73
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 104
- Geometry and Topology 28
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 41
Countries citing papers authored by Erhard Scholz
This map shows the geographic impact of Erhard Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erhard Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erhard Scholz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erhard Scholz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erhard Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erhard Scholz. The network helps show where Erhard Scholz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Erhard Scholz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | Weyl's search for a difference between `physical'
\nand `mathematical' automorphisms | 2016 | 1 |
| 6 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 15 | Geschichte der Algebra : eine Einführung | 1990 | 3 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1982 | 8 | |
| 20 | Geschichte des Mannigfaltigkeitsbegriffs von Riemann bis Poincaré | 1980 | 19 |
About Erhard Scholz
Erhard Scholz is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (10 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (4 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (83 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (104 citations). Erhard Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Dennis Lehmkuhl, Matthias Kreck, Norbert Schappacher, Lesley A. Ogilvie, Jon Curtis, Manfred R. Schroeder, Bodo Lange, Christoph Steininger, Hans Lehrach and Johann Jakob Burckhardt. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology and General Relativity and Gravitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.