Erhard Blum

59 total papers · 472 total citations
20 papers, 88 citations indexed

About

Erhard Blum is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Erhard Blum has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 88 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Religious studies, 11 papers in Archeology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Erhard Blum's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (11 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers). Erhard Blum is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (11 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers). Erhard Blum collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Netherlands. Erhard Blum's co-authors include John Van Seters, Marvin A. Sweeney, Ehud Ben Zvi, Stefan Seiler and Stefan Gehrig and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Vetus Testamentum and Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft.

In The Last Decade

Erhard Blum

10 papers receiving 57 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Erhard Blum	78	55	35	12	5	20	88
Alexander Rofé	63 0.8×	45 0.8×	29 0.8×	12 1.0×	4 0.8×	22	87
Michael H. Floyd	73 0.9×	42 0.8×	49 1.4×	14 1.2×	6 1.2×	17	89
Klaus Baltzer	89 1.1×	54 1.0×	49 1.4×	10 0.8×	6 1.2×	15	101
Moshe J. Bernstein	59 0.8×	52 0.9×	35 1.0×	7 0.6×	4 0.8×	20	72
Alan J. Hauser	71 0.9×	44 0.8×	37 1.1×	8 0.7×	5 1.0×	15	95
Christophe Nihan	85 1.1×	54 1.0×	35 1.0×	20 1.7×	6 1.2×	19	105
Jeffrey Stackert	47 0.6×	33 0.6×	22 0.6×	8 0.7×	4 0.8×	20	55
Martin G. Abegg	77 1.0×	60 1.1×	40 1.1×	9 0.8×	8 1.6×	15	99
Jonathan Stökl	55 0.7×	39 0.7×	32 0.9×	18 1.5×	4 0.8×	18	64
Michael A. Knibb	83 1.1×	70 1.3×	44 1.3×	8 0.7×	8 1.6×	25	97

Countries citing papers authored by Erhard Blum

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erhard Blum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erhard Blum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erhard Blum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erhard Blum

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erhard Blum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erhard Blum. The network helps show where Erhard Blum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erhard Blum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erhard Blum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erhard Blum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erhard Blum. Erhard Blum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact