Ephraim Kanarfogel
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Archeology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Religious studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ivan G. MarcusR. Po‐chia HsiaHartmut Lehmann
- Topics
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy (9 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (7 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsReligious studiesPhilosophy
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryHistory of Education Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ephraim Kanarfogel
10 papers receiving 50 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Sociology and Political Science 50
- Philosophy 25
- Archeology 21
- History 14
- Religious studies 13
Countries citing papers authored by Ephraim Kanarfogel
This map shows the geographic impact of Ephraim Kanarfogel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ephraim Kanarfogel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ephraim Kanarfogel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ephraim Kanarfogel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ephraim Kanarfogel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ephraim Kanarfogel. The network helps show where Ephraim Kanarfogel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ephraim Kanarfogel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ephraim Kanarfogel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ephraim Kanarfogel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ephraim Kanarfogel. Ephraim Kanarfogel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Brothers from Afar: Rabbinic Approaches to Apostasy and Reversion in Medieval Europe | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | The Intellectual History and Rabbinic Culture of Medieval Ashkenaz | 8 |
| 6 | Mothers and Children: Jewish Family Life in Medieval Europe | 25 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | "Peering Through the Lattices": Mystical, Magical, and Pietistic Dimensions in the Tosafist Period | 14 |
| 10 | Peering Through the Lattices | 2 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2 |
About Ephraim Kanarfogel
Ephraim Kanarfogel is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Archeology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 78 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Classical Philosophy (9 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (7 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (12 citations), Religious studies (13 citations) and Philosophy (25 citations). Ephraim Kanarfogel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ivan G. Marcus, R. Po‐chia Hsia and Hartmut Lehmann. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and History of Education Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.