En‐Te Hwu

1.2k citations
75 papers · 931 indexed · h-index 18
Topics
Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (29 papers)Mechanical and Optical Resonators (26 papers)Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (15 papers)
Journals
Journal of the American Chemical SocietySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied Physics Letters
Partner nations
TaiwanDenmarkGermany

In The Last Decade

En‐Te Hwu

73 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers

En‐Te Hwu
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Biomedical Engineering 396
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 355
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 338
  • Molecular Biology 122
  • Control and Systems Engineering 86
Replace Philip D. Prewett with:
Philip D. Prewett United Kingdom
Sei Jin Park United States
Sudipto K. De United States
Bongsu Kim South Korea
Pola Goldberg Oppenheimer United Kingdom
Suiqiong Li United States
Priscila M. Kosaka Spain
Armando Ricciardi Italy
Boonsong Sutapun Thailand
En‐Te Hwu relative to Philip D. Prewett United Kingdom Philip D. Prewett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.5×
Philip D. Prewett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by En‐Te Hwu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of En‐Te Hwu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by En‐Te Hwu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites En‐Te Hwu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by En‐Te Hwu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by En‐Te Hwu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by En‐Te Hwu. The network helps show where En‐Te Hwu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of En‐Te Hwu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of En‐Te Hwu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of En‐Te Hwu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with En‐Te Hwu. En‐Te Hwu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 1
4 2
5 2
6 3
7 9
8 7
9 61
10 16
11 6
12 5
13 29
14 45
15 2
16 12
17 10
18 14
19 14
20 16

About En‐Te Hwu

En‐Te Hwu is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 75 papers that have together received 931 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (29 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (26 papers) and Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (355 citations), Structural Biology (15 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (396 citations). En‐Te Hwu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anja Boisen, Ing‐Shouh Hwang, Shao-Kang Hung, Filippo Bosco, Hsien-Shun Liao, Chih‐Wen Yang, Stephan Sylvest Keller, Mikkel Fougt Hansen, Marco Donolato and Kai-Yi Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026