Enrique Navas
Impact in
- Microbiology top 0.5%
- Virology top 2%
- HIV Research and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 8
- Co-authors
- Santiago MorenoCarmen QueredaJesús FortünPilar Martín‐DávilaJosé L. CasadoVicente PintadoAna MorenoFernando Dronda
- Journals
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (6 papers)Clinical Microbiology and Infection (4 papers)Clinical Infectious Diseases (3 papers)Medicine (3 papers)Infection (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Enrique Navas
77 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Microbiology 100
- Virology 229
- Infectious Diseases 821
- Epidemiology 1.0k
- Microbiology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Enrique Navas
This map shows the geographic impact of Enrique Navas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enrique Navas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enrique Navas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Enrique Navas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enrique Navas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enrique Navas. The network helps show where Enrique Navas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Enrique Navas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 123 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 154 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 82 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 9 |
About Enrique Navas
Enrique Navas is a scholar working on Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Virology, Epidemiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (23 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (13 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (9 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (8 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (7 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (7 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (100 citations), Virology (229 citations), Infectious Diseases (821 citations), Epidemiology (1.0k citations) and Microbiology (101 citations). Enrique Navas has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Santiago Moreno, Carmen Quereda, Jesús Fortün, Pilar Martín‐Dávila, José L. Casado, Vicente Pintado, Ana Moreno, Fernando Dronda, Maria Jesús Pérez‐Elías and Javier Cobo. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Medicine and Infection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.