Ennio Stacchetti
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.2%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 0.1%
- Safety Research top 0.2%
- Marketing top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- David PearceDilip AbreuFaruk GülJohn GeanakoplosBenny MoldovanuPhilippe JéhielChristopher PhelanSalvador Barberà
- Topics
- Economic theories and models (15 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (9 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Ennio Stacchetti
29 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Economics and Econometrics 2.3k
- Management Science and Operations Research 1.9k
- Safety Research 978
- Marketing 572
- Sociology and Political Science 300
Countries citing papers authored by Ennio Stacchetti
This map shows the geographic impact of Ennio Stacchetti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ennio Stacchetti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ennio Stacchetti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ennio Stacchetti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ennio Stacchetti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ennio Stacchetti. The network helps show where Ennio Stacchetti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ennio Stacchetti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ennio Stacchetti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ennio Stacchetti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ennio Stacchetti. Ennio Stacchetti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Essays on learning with bounded memory | 0 |
| 6 | Investment Dynamics in Electricity Markets | 3 |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 126 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 186 | |
| 13 | Auction design for the Colombian electricity market | 2 |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | How (not) to sell nuclear weapons | 233 |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 148 | |
| 19 | Psychological games and sequential rationalitybreakdown → | 635 |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ennio Stacchetti
Ennio Stacchetti is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (15 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (9 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (1.9k citations), General Decision Sciences (255 citations) and Safety Research (978 citations). Ennio Stacchetti has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Pearce, Dilip Abreu, Faruk Gül, John Geanakoplos, Benny Moldovanu, Philippe Jéhiel, Christopher Phelan, Salvador Barberà, René Caldentey and Alfredo García. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Econometrica and Journal of Economic Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.