Enis Cela
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Co-authors
- Eleni ΚoustaMark I. McCarthyStephen FranksDavinia WhiteUmberto NicoliniAnna PennyDesmond G. JohnstonNatasha Lawrence
- Topics
- Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers)Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (4 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Enis Cela
13 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Reproductive Medicine 188
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 170
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 145
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 122
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 89
Countries citing papers authored by Enis Cela
This map shows the geographic impact of Enis Cela's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enis Cela with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enis Cela more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Enis Cela
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enis Cela. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enis Cela. The network helps show where Enis Cela may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Enis Cela
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Enis Cela. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Enis Cela based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Enis Cela. Enis Cela is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 69 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 83 | |
| 15 | 69 |
About Enis Cela
Enis Cela is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (4 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (188 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (170 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (122 citations). Enis Cela has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Eleni Κousta, Mark I. McCarthy, Stephen Franks, Davinia White, Umberto Nicolini, Anna Penny, Desmond G. Johnston, Natasha Lawrence, Barbara A. Millauer and Helen Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.