Enid Rockwell
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Co-authors
- Dilip V. JesteJonathan P. LacroMichael P. CaligiuriM. Jackuelyn HarrisJames B. LohrAnne BaileyEdwin K. JacksonD. V. Jeste
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryThe British Journal of PsychiatryJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Enid Rockwell
23 papers receiving 944 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Psychiatry and Mental health 626
- Neurology 217
- Clinical Psychology 166
- Pharmacology 136
- Philosophy 113
Countries citing papers authored by Enid Rockwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Enid Rockwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enid Rockwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enid Rockwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Enid Rockwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enid Rockwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enid Rockwell. The network helps show where Enid Rockwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Enid Rockwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Enid Rockwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Enid Rockwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Enid Rockwell. Enid Rockwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 76 | |
| 2 | 86 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | 182 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | Conventional vs. newer antipsychotics in elderly patients. | 127 |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Enid Rockwell
Enid Rockwell is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (626 citations), Neurology (217 citations) and Philosophy (113 citations). Enid Rockwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dilip V. Jeste, Jonathan P. Lacro, Michael P. Caligiuri, M. Jackuelyn Harris, James B. Lohr, Anne Bailey, Dilip V. Jeste, Edwin K. Jackson, D. V. Jeste and M. Jackuelyn Harris. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.