Emma Tumilty

30 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Emma Tumilty
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Research and Theory 9
  • General Health Professions 107
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Emergency Medical Services 20
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 21
Replace Linda J. Patrick with:
Linda J. Patrick Canada
Malebona Precious Matsoso Papua New Guinea
Geneviève Roch Canada
Elizabeth L. Munnich United States
Lori Melichar United States
Alfredo L. Fort United States
Sharon Licqurish Australia
Barbara Coyle United Kingdom
Carolyn Ingram Ireland
Shagufta Perveen Pakistan
Emma Tumilty relative to Linda J. Patrick Canada Linda J. Patrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Linda J. Patrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Tumilty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Tumilty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Tumilty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Tumilty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Tumilty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Tumilty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Tumilty. The network helps show where Emma Tumilty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Tumilty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Tumilty Line = papers co-authored together Emma Tumilty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201737
2 201535
3 201632
4 201627
5 201827
6 201826
7 201623
8 201621
9 201917
10 201617
11 20208
12 20218
13 20198
14 20208
15 20207
16
Patterns of public participation : opportunity structures and mobilization from a cross-national perspective \n
20166
17 20136
18 20185
19 20224
20 20183

About Emma Tumilty

Emma Tumilty is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), General Health Professions (107 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Emergency Medical Services (20 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (21 citations). Emma Tumilty has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tim Stokes, Fiona Doolan‐Noble, Robin Gauld, Albert Weale, Martin Tolich, Katharina Kieslich, Peter Littlejohns, Sally Pairman, Norma Campbell and Elaine Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Organization and Management, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ Open, The American Journal of Bioethics and BMC Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact