Emma Teirlynck
About
In The Last Decade
Emma Teirlynck
5 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Animal Science and Zoology 233
- Molecular Biology 106
- Food Science 86
- Plant Science 52
- Small Animals 44
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Teirlynck
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Teirlynck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Teirlynck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Teirlynck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Teirlynck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Teirlynck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Teirlynck. The network helps show where Emma Teirlynck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Teirlynck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Teirlynck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Teirlynck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Teirlynck. Emma Teirlynck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86 | |
| 2 | 122 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 98 | |
| 5 | Mechanisms of action of nutritional tools to control intestinal zoonotic pathogens | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.