Emma Smith

3.0k total citations
94 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Emma Smith is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Education and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Smith has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Occupational Therapy, 29 papers in Education and 28 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Emma Smith's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (36 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (28 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (12 papers). Emma Smith is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (36 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (28 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (12 papers). Emma Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Emma Smith's co-authors include Stephen Gorard, William C. Miller, Brodie M. Sakakibara, W. Ben Mortenson, Ed Giesbrecht, Malcolm MacLachlan, Ikenna D. Ebuenyi, Patrick White, Normand Boucher and Larry E. Suter and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Emma Smith

83 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Smith United Kingdom 24 735 366 278 248 232 94 1.7k
Sally French United Kingdom 17 429 0.6× 176 0.5× 579 2.1× 857 3.5× 142 0.6× 54 1.9k
Fabricio E. Balcázar United States 26 403 0.5× 182 0.5× 663 2.4× 822 3.3× 114 0.5× 99 2.5k
Christopher B. Keys United States 31 621 0.8× 110 0.3× 799 2.9× 874 3.5× 162 0.7× 104 3.1k
Nicholas Watson United Kingdom 27 572 0.8× 99 0.3× 921 3.3× 823 3.3× 90 0.4× 136 2.8k
James A. Athanasou Australia 18 462 0.6× 40 0.1× 249 0.9× 271 1.1× 55 0.2× 156 1.8k
Benito Arias Martínez Spain 25 322 0.4× 63 0.2× 268 1.0× 307 1.2× 169 0.7× 136 1.7k
Yolanda Suarez‐Balcazar United States 28 377 0.5× 186 0.5× 571 2.1× 211 0.9× 138 0.6× 104 2.2k
Jane Seale United Kingdom 29 922 1.3× 339 0.9× 362 1.3× 547 2.2× 42 0.2× 107 2.3k
Peter Blanck United States 29 233 0.3× 204 0.6× 532 1.9× 1.2k 4.8× 87 0.4× 159 2.9k
Katherine D. Seelman United States 8 132 0.2× 93 0.3× 219 0.8× 266 1.1× 66 0.3× 26 875

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Smith. The network helps show where Emma Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Smith. Emma Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Radcliffe, Polly, Emma Smith, Shirley Lewis, et al.. (2025). Navigating surveillance: The experience of prenatal women who use or who are in treatment for using drugs. The British Journal of Social Work. 56(1). 86–105.
2.
Smith, Emma, Ying Zhang, Lannie Ligthart, & Ikenna D. Ebuenyi. (2024). Development of Priority Assistive Product Lists in Three African Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 21(11). 1393–1393.
3.
Layton, Natasha, et al.. (2023). Occupational therapy and its roles in implementing the WHO/UNICEF global report on assistive technology. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin. 79(2). 109–117. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ebuenyi, Ikenna D., et al.. (2023). The IDEAL PROCESS for developing Assistive Technology policy. Assistive Technology. 36(3). 224–231. 3 indexed citations
6.
Boggs, Dorothy, Emma Smith, Vinícius Delgado Ramos, et al.. (2021). Measuring assistive technology supply and demand: A scoping review. Assistive Technology. 33(sup1). S35–S49. 13 indexed citations
7.
Ebuenyi, Ikenna D., et al.. (2021). Socio-Demographic Factors Influencing the Use of Assistive Technology among Children with Disabilities in Malawi. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(6). 3062–3062. 6 indexed citations
8.
Ebuenyi, Ikenna D., et al.. (2021). Empirical research and available data on assistive technology for persons with disabilities in Malawi: A review. Assistive Technology. 35(1). 94–106. 7 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Emma, Ikenna D. Ebuenyi, Elena V. Syurina, et al.. (2020). Assistive Technology Use and Provision During COVID-19: Results From a Rapid Global Survey. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 11(6). 747–756. 25 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Emma, et al.. (2020). Developing inclusive and resilient systems: COVID-19 and assistive technology. Disability & Society. 36(1). 151–154. 15 indexed citations
11.
Ebuenyi, Ikenna D., et al.. (2020). Implementation of the Assistive Product List (APL) in Malawi through development of appropriate policy and systems: an action research protocol. BMJ Open. 10(11). e040281–e040281. 14 indexed citations
12.
Berardi, Anna, Emma Smith, & William C. Miller. (2020). Assistive technology use and unmet need in Canada. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 16(8). 851–856. 17 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Emma. (2018). Exploring Survival: A Student-Led Unit in the Seventh-Grade English Classroom. The English Journal. 107(5). 66–71. 1 indexed citations
14.
Rushton, Paula W., et al.. (2018). Reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS) outcome measure. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 14(3). 250–254. 10 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Emma, Lynn Roberts, Mary Ann McColl, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, & William C. Miller. (2018). National evaluation of policies governing funding for wheelchairs and scooters in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 85(1). 46–57. 6 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Emma, Brodie M. Sakakibara, & William C. Miller. (2014). A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 11(5). 361–374. 100 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Emma. (2010). Underachievement, failing youth and moral panics. Evaluation & Research in Education. 23(1). 37–49. 13 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Emma. (2009). What can secondary data analysis tell us about school exclusions in England?. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 32(1). 89–101. 4 indexed citations
19.
Gorard, Stephen & Emma Smith. (2007). Do barriers get in the way? A review of the determinants of post‐16 participation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 12(2). 141–158. 32 indexed citations
20.
Baye, Ariane, Marc Demeuse, Stephen Gorard, et al.. (2005). Equity in European Education Systems. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026