Emma Schwager

7.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Emma Schwager is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Schwager has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 6 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Emma Schwager's work include Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). Emma Schwager is often cited by papers focused on Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). Emma Schwager collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Germany. Emma Schwager's co-authors include Curtis Huttenhower, Boyu Ren, Himel Mallick, Eric A. Franzosa, Levi Waldron, Siyuan Ma, Timothy L. Tickle, Ali Rahnavard, Lauren J. McIver and George Weingart and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nature Biotechnology and Bioinformatics.

In The Last Decade

Emma Schwager

17 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Multivariable association discovery in population-scale m... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Schwager United States 11 1.5k 394 283 256 207 18 2.2k
Himel Mallick United States 17 1.7k 1.1× 426 1.1× 300 1.1× 247 1.0× 232 1.1× 36 2.5k
Jeremy E. Wilkinson United States 18 1.2k 0.8× 393 1.0× 228 0.8× 191 0.7× 142 0.7× 31 2.0k
Siyuan Ma United States 13 1.3k 0.8× 331 0.8× 243 0.9× 207 0.8× 147 0.7× 29 2.1k
Ayshwarya Subramanian United States 12 1.8k 1.2× 419 1.1× 230 0.8× 238 0.9× 144 0.7× 16 2.8k
Mi Young Lim South Korea 26 1.4k 0.9× 465 1.2× 433 1.5× 200 0.8× 272 1.3× 54 2.1k
Arvind Venkataraman United States 17 1.5k 1.0× 419 1.1× 260 0.9× 286 1.1× 252 1.2× 26 2.7k
Evgeni Levin Netherlands 21 1.4k 0.9× 624 1.6× 317 1.1× 302 1.2× 180 0.9× 59 2.3k
Till Robin Lesker Germany 16 1.6k 1.0× 340 0.9× 448 1.6× 240 0.9× 363 1.8× 27 2.5k
Lingjing Jiang United States 17 1.2k 0.8× 437 1.1× 191 0.7× 164 0.6× 183 0.9× 32 2.0k
Damian R. Plichta United States 21 1.4k 0.9× 329 0.8× 316 1.1× 208 0.8× 227 1.1× 31 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Schwager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Schwager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Schwager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Schwager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Schwager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Schwager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Schwager. The network helps show where Emma Schwager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Schwager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Schwager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Schwager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Schwager. Emma Schwager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Schwager, Emma, et al.. (2024). Machine learning modelling for predicting the utilization of invasive and non‐invasive ventilation throughout the ICU duration. Healthcare Technology Letters. 11(4). 252–257. 1 indexed citations
2.
Myers, Laura C., Nicholas A. Bosch, Kathleen A. Daly, et al.. (2024). Opioid Administration Practice Patterns in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Who Undergo Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Critical Care Explorations. 6(7). e1123–e1123.
3.
Schwager, Emma, et al.. (2023). Machine learning prediction of the total duration of invasive and non-invasive ventilation During ICU Stay. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(9). e0000289–e0000289. 4 indexed citations
4.
Khanna, Ashish K., Takahiro Kinoshita, Annamalai Natarajan, et al.. (2023). Association of systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse pressure with morbidity and mortality in septic ICU patients: a nationwide observational study. Annals of Intensive Care. 13(1). 9–9. 20 indexed citations
5.
Schwager, Emma, Erina Ghosh, Larry J. Eshelman, et al.. (2023). Accurate and interpretable prediction of ICU-acquired AKI. Journal of Critical Care. 75. 154278–154278. 8 indexed citations
6.
Ghazi, Andrew R., Ali Rahnavard, Eric A. Franzosa, et al.. (2022). High-sensitivity pattern discovery in large, paired multiomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 38(Supplement_1). i378–i385. 35 indexed citations
7.
Schwager, Emma, Erina Ghosh, Larry J. Eshelman, et al.. (2021). Including urinary output to define AKI enhances the performance of machine learning models to predict AKI at admission. Journal of Critical Care. 62. 283–288. 4 indexed citations
8.
Ma, Siyuan, Boyu Ren, Himel Mallick, et al.. (2021). A statistical model for describing and simulating microbial community profiles. PLoS Computational Biology. 17(9). e1008913–e1008913. 40 indexed citations
9.
Schwager, Emma, Sonja Schiffer, Yale Chang, et al.. (2021). Utilizing machine learning to improve clinical trial design for acute respiratory distress syndrome. npj Digital Medicine. 4(1). 133–133. 19 indexed citations
10.
Mallick, Himel, Ali Rahnavard, Lauren J. McIver, et al.. (2021). Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Computational Biology. 17(11). e1009442–e1009442. 1302 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Ghosh, Erina, Larry J. Eshelman, Emma Schwager, et al.. (2021). Estimation of Baseline Serum Creatinine with Machine Learning. American Journal of Nephrology. 52(9). 753–762. 5 indexed citations
12.
Shawwa, Khaled, et al.. (2020). Predicting acute kidney injury in critically ill patients using comorbid conditions utilizing machine learning. Clinical Kidney Journal. 14(5). 1428–1435. 25 indexed citations
13.
Schwager, Emma, Himel Mallick, Steffen Ventz, & Curtis Huttenhower. (2017). A Bayesian method for detecting pairwise associations in compositional data. PLoS Computational Biology. 13(11). e1005852–e1005852. 32 indexed citations
14.
Sinha, Rashmi, Galeb Abu-Ali, Emily Vogtmann, et al.. (2017). Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium. Nature Biotechnology. 35(11). 1077–1086. 314 indexed citations
15.
Yasuda, Koji, Tiffany Hsu, Carey Ann Gallini, et al.. (2017). Fluoride Depletes Acidogenic Taxa in Oral but Not Gut Microbial Communities in Mice. mSystems. 2(4). 22 indexed citations
16.
Schwager, Emma, Chengwei Luo, Curtis Huttenhower, & Xochitl C. Morgan. (2015). Genomic Sequencing and Other Tools for Studying Microbial Communities. Microbe Magazine. 10(10). 419–425. 2 indexed citations
17.
Tong, Maomeng, Ian McHardy, Paul Ruegger, et al.. (2014). Reprograming of gut microbiome energy metabolism by the FUT2 Crohn’s disease risk polymorphism. The ISME Journal. 8(11). 2193–2206. 159 indexed citations
18.
McHardy, Ian, Maryam Goudarzi, Maomeng Tong, et al.. (2013). Integrative analysis of the microbiome and metabolome of the human intestinal mucosal surface reveals exquisite inter-relationships. Microbiome. 1(1). 17–17. 225 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026