Emma L. Williams

2.4k total citations
56 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Emma L. Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma L. Williams has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Molecular Biology, 18 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 12 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Emma L. Williams's work include Vitamin D Research Studies (11 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (9 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (9 papers). Emma L. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Vitamin D Research Studies (11 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (9 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (9 papers). Emma L. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Emma L. Williams's co-authors include Gill Rumsby, C. J. Edwards, Marion B. Coulter-Mackie, Daniel H. Wiseman, Allan M. Jordan, Daniel P. Mould, Sally A. Hulton, Mustafa B.A. Djamgoz, Alison E. McGonagle and Gary J. Spencer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Emma L. Williams

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Emma L. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Molecular Biology 855
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 502
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 451
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 175
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 167
Replace Paola Altieri with:
Paola Altieri Italy
Yasuyuki Nagasawa Japan
Sophie Vandermeersch France
Barbara R. Cole United States
Pietro Strisciuglio Italy
Kara L. Cushing‐Haugen United States
R.A. Hannon United Kingdom
Anand P. Chokkalingam United States
Zbigniew Gaciong Poland
Paola Altieri Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emma L. Williams
Emma L. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emma L. Williams
Emma L. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Williams. The network helps show where Emma L. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma L. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma L. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma L. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma L. Williams. Emma L. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 7
4 10
5 5
6 3
7 5
8 6
9 8
10 137
11 24
12 52
13 45
14 53
15 33
16 149
17 25
18 9
19 85
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026