Sarah Creighton

161 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

Sarah Creighton
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Urology 820
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 623
  • Reproductive Medicine 438
  • Rheumatology 648
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
Replace Sonia Grover with:
Sonia Grover Australia
Elisabeth H. Quint United States
Steven Weyers Belgium
David A. Nyberg United States
Vyta Senikas Canada
Christina Raker United States
David Muram United States
Lee Warner United States
Stephen L. Corson United States
Suzanne Cliver United States
Sarah Creighton relative to Sonia Grover Australia Sonia Grover's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Sonia Grover · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Creighton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Creighton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Creighton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Creighton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Creighton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Creighton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Creighton. The network helps show where Sarah Creighton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Creighton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Creighton Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Creighton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 163 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005259
2 2003194
3 2007157
4 1992156
5 2007137
6 2003101
7 200398
8 201296
9 200595
10 201489
11 199086
12 201179
13 200674
14 200673
15 201072
16 200371
17 201266
18 202066
19 201364
20 200262

About Sarah Creighton

Sarah Creighton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, having authored 163 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (47 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (31 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (24 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (19 papers), Genital Health and Disease (16 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (10 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (820 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (623 citations), Reproductive Medicine (438 citations), Rheumatology (648 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations). Sarah Creighton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lih‐Mei Liao, Naomi S. Crouch, Catherine L Minto, Christopher R.J. Woodhouse, Gerard S. Conway, Lih Mei Liao, Stuart L. Stanton, Dan Wood, Melissa Davies and Alfred Cutner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, British Journal of Urology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Sexually Transmitted Infections and Journal of Pediatric Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact