Emma Knapp
Impact in
-
- Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Sports injuries and prevention
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Exercise and Physiological Responses
Papers in
-
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 5
- Foot and Ankle Surgery 4
- Bone health and osteoporosis research 3
- Surgery 11
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment 5
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 4
- Co-authors
- Alayna E. Loiselle (6 shared papers)Hani A. Awad (17 shared papers)Katherine T. Best (5 shared papers)Anne E. C. Nichols (4 shared papers)Wenxuan Liu (1 shared paper)Joe V. Chakkalakal (1 shared paper)Nicole D. Paris (1 shared paper)John F. Bachman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2 papers)eLife (2 papers)Journal of Biomechanics (2 papers)Foot & Ankle International (2 papers)Science Signaling (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandIsrael
In The Last Decade
Emma Knapp
21 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 185
- Rehabilitation 38
- Surgery 151
- Cell Biology 52
- Aging 5
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Knapp
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Knapp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Knapp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Knapp. The network helps show where Emma Knapp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1 |
About Emma Knapp
Emma Knapp is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (5 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (5 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (2 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (185 citations), Rehabilitation (38 citations), Surgery (151 citations), Cell Biology (52 citations) and Aging (5 citations). Emma Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Alayna E. Loiselle, Hani A. Awad, Katherine T. Best, Anne E. C. Nichols, Wenxuan Liu, Joe V. Chakkalakal, Nicole D. Paris, John F. Bachman, Alanna Klose and Jessica E. Ackerman. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Sports Medicine, eLife, Journal of Biomechanics, Foot & Ankle International and Science Signaling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.