Emma Johnson

889 citations
25 papers · 666 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Johnson

23 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

Emma Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 112
  • Ecological Modeling 42
  • Animal Science and Zoology 74
  • Plant Science 225
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 116
Replace David H. Thomas with:
David H. Thomas United Kingdom
Philip L. Wright United States
Emilia Pers‐Kamczyc Poland
John D. Eisemann United States
Itzick Vatnick United States
F. Pizzi Italy
Miao Fang China
Hélène Joly France
J. Boyazoglu Greece
Emma Johnson relative to David H. Thomas United Kingdom David H. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
David H. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Johnson. The network helps show where Emma Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Emma Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002226
2 2008152
3 201479
4 199325
5 196222
6 201119
7 196218
8 198517
9 196217
10 201514
11 201212
12 199410
13 20159
14
Clostridium difficile infection in the elderly.
20139
15 20158
16 20125
17
Microbial quality of litter and performance of broilers receiving elevated levels of dietary copper.
19804
18 19554
19 19564
20 20114

About Emma Johnson

Emma Johnson is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Infectious Diseases, Plant Science, Ecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (3 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers), Moringa oleifera research and applications (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (112 citations), Ecological Modeling (42 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (74 citations), Plant Science (225 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (116 citations). Emma Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Timothy G. Barraclough, Claire de Mazancourt, Kerry M. Kothari, Susan B. Altenbach, Frances M. DuPont, R. Chan, Robert N. Shoffner, Ray E. Burger, Nicola Petrosillo and Stefano Di Bella. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, BMC Infectious Diseases, British Poultry Science, Ecology Letters and Gut.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact