Emma G. Thomas

22 total papers · 492 total citations
16 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Emma G. Thomas is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma G. Thomas has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Emma G. Thomas's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). Emma G. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). Emma G. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Emma G. Thomas's co-authors include Stuart A. Kinner, Matthew J. Spittal, Faye S. Taxman, Ed Heffernan, Tom Collins, Francesca Dominici, Bamini Jayabalasingham, Rosa Alati, Jeroen Geertzen and Katherine J. Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Emma G. Thomas

15 papers receiving 313 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma G. Thomas 114 94 82 76 70 16 324
Nicholas S. Riano 88 0.8× 62 0.7× 85 1.0× 32 0.4× 91 1.3× 15 285
Elizabeth Hinton 117 1.0× 83 0.9× 89 1.1× 58 0.8× 34 0.5× 21 327
Charis P. Kaite 124 1.1× 53 0.6× 63 0.8× 87 1.1× 27 0.4× 14 324
Dázon Dixon Diallo 142 1.2× 70 0.7× 51 0.6× 55 0.7× 30 0.4× 19 343
Hy Lam 112 1.0× 85 0.9× 71 0.9× 110 1.4× 22 0.3× 11 358
Denise Charron-Prochownik 126 1.1× 34 0.4× 74 0.9× 71 0.9× 21 0.3× 19 356
W. Michael Byrd 151 1.3× 104 1.1× 74 0.9× 60 0.8× 40 0.6× 14 339
Sandra Minor Bulmer 86 0.8× 40 0.4× 82 1.0× 82 1.1× 15 0.2× 17 339
Mary Harris 137 1.2× 30 0.3× 133 1.6× 27 0.4× 84 1.2× 23 339
Robert Victor 87 0.8× 65 0.7× 113 1.4× 40 0.5× 104 1.5× 9 322

Countries citing papers authored by Emma G. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma G. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma G. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma G. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma G. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma G. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma G. Thomas. The network helps show where Emma G. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma G. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma G. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma G. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma G. Thomas. Emma G. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026