This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Cunliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Cunliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Cunliffe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Cunliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Cunliffe. The network helps show where Emma Cunliffe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Cunliffe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Cunliffe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Cunliffe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Cunliffe. Emma Cunliffe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cunliffe, Emma & Gary Edmond. (2021). Justice without science? Judging the reliability of forensic science in Canada. eYLS (Yale Law School). 99(1).1 indexed citations
3.
Cunliffe, Emma. (2020). The Magic Gun: Settler legality, Forensic Science, and the Stanley Trial. eYLS (Yale Law School). 98(2). 270.1 indexed citations
Cunliffe, Emma, et al.. (2020). How the Hollow Ways got their form and kept them: 5000 years of Hollow Ways at Tell al-Hawa.1 indexed citations
6.
Edmond, Gary, Emma Cunliffe, Kristy A. Martire, & Mehera San Roque. (2019). Forensic science evidence and the limits of cross-examination. Melbourne University law review. 42(3). 858–920.6 indexed citations
7.
Cunliffe, Emma, et al.. (2018). The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Unnecessary Distraction or Mission-Relevant Priority?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Edmond, Gary & Emma Cunliffe. (2016). Cinderella Story? The Social Production Of A Forensic “Science”. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 106(2). 219–274.5 indexed citations
10.
Edmond, Gary, Bryan Found, Kristy A. Martire, et al.. (2016). Model forensic science. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48(5). 496–537.38 indexed citations
Cunliffe, Emma. (2016). The Ethics of Expert Evidence. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
13.
Edmond, Gary, Simon A. Cole, Emma Cunliffe, & Andrew Roberts. (2014). Admissibility Compared: The Reception of Incriminating Expert Evidence (I.E., Forensic Science) in Four Adversarial Jurisdictions. Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver). 3(1). 31.7 indexed citations
14.
Cunliffe, Emma, et al.. (2014). Towards a protection of the Syrian cultural heritage: A summary of the international responses (March 2011 – March 2014).1 indexed citations
Cunliffe, Emma, et al.. (2012). The Archaeological Landscape of the Tell Beydar Region: An Update Using Satellite Imagery.1 indexed citations
18.
Cunliffe, Emma, et al.. (2012). How to Build a Dam and Save Cultural Heritage. The Library of Electronic Cyprus Thematic Organized Collections (LYKYTHOS) (University of Cyprus). 1(1_suppl). 221–226.5 indexed citations
19.
Cunliffe, Emma, et al.. (2007). Writing the Circle: Judicially Convened Sentencing Circles and the Textual Organization of Criminal Justice. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit. 19(1). 1–35.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.