Emma Boger

619 total citations
9 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Emma Boger is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Boger has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Epidemiology, 4 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emma Boger's work include Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers). Emma Boger is often cited by papers focused on Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers). Emma Boger collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Emma Boger's co-authors include Sue Latter, Sara Demain, Claire Foster, Fiona Jones, Anne Kennedy, Jaimie Ellis, Anthony Jones, P. J. Julyan, Rebecca Elliott and Wael El‐Deredy and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Social Science & Medicine and Lara D. Veeken.

In The Last Decade

Emma Boger

9 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Boger United Kingdom	6	124	124	99	98	97	9	468
Bruno de Souza Moreira Brazil	16	60 0.5×	236 1.9×	65 0.7×	60 0.6×	68 0.7×	65	733
Debbie J. Bean New Zealand	13	49 0.4×	178 1.4×	39 0.4×	407 4.2×	63 0.6×	27	722
Denise Shuk Ting Cheung Hong Kong	17	122 1.0×	171 1.4×	40 0.4×	27 0.3×	44 0.5×	81	821
Ana Myriam Lavín‐Pérez Spain	10	72 0.6×	191 1.5×	25 0.3×	82 0.8×	29 0.3×	25	554
Angela L.H. Buffington United States	12	97 0.8×	66 0.5×	166 1.7×	162 1.7×	13 0.1×	22	690
Pao‐Feng Tsai United States	13	113 0.9×	56 0.5×	23 0.2×	73 0.7×	15 0.2×	39	484
Piet Rispens Netherlands	16	90 0.7×	235 1.9×	25 0.3×	56 0.6×	29 0.3×	21	673
Carol A. Kemp United States	6	75 0.6×	62 0.5×	18 0.2×	243 2.5×	29 0.3×	8	388
Rachel Botell United Kingdom	2	122 1.0×	36 0.3×	51 0.5×	53 0.5×	20 0.2×	4	485
Ahmed Alhowimel Saudi Arabia	13	77 0.6×	82 0.7×	36 0.4×	240 2.4×	13 0.1×	71	530

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Boger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Boger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Boger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Boger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Boger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Boger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Boger. The network helps show where Emma Boger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Boger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Boger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Boger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Boger. Emma Boger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Ellis, Jaimie, Emma Boger, Sue Latter, et al.. (2017). Conceptualisation of the ‘good’ self-manager: A qualitative investigation of stakeholder views on the self-management of long-term health conditions. Social Science & Medicine. 176. 25–33. 60 indexed citations

Boger, Emma, Jaimie Ellis, Sue Latter, et al.. (2015). Self-Management and Self-Management Support Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Mixed Research Synthesis of Stakeholder Views. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0130990–e0130990. 120 indexed citations

Boger, Emma, Matthew Hankins, Sara Demain, & Sue Latter. (2015). Development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient -reported outcome measure for stroke self -management: The Southampton Stroke Self - Management Questionnaire (SSSMQ). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 13(1). 165–165. 23 indexed citations

Demain, Sara, Emma Boger, Sue Latter, et al.. (2014). What are the outcomes of self-management that matter to stakeholders? Study protocol for the Self-management VOICED project. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 36(11). e908–e910. 5 indexed citations

Boger, Emma, Sara Demain, & Sue Latter. (2014). Stroke self-management: A focus group study to identify the factors influencing self-management following stroke. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 52(1). 175–187. 48 indexed citations

Boger, Emma, Sara Demain, & Sue Latter. (2012). Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation. 35(17). 1415–1428. 37 indexed citations

Kulkarni, B, Deborah E. Bentley, Rebecca Elliott, et al.. (2007). Arthritic pain is processed in brain areas concerned with emotions and fear. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 56(4). 1345–1354. 169 indexed citations

Kulkarni, B, et al.. (2005). Attentional dysfunction in fibromyalgia. Lara D. Veeken. 44. 1 indexed citations

Boger, Emma & Anthony Jones. (2005). Paracetamol use in musculoskeletal pain: an audit of use and patient perceptions of paracetamol as an effective analgesic. Musculoskeletal Care. 3(4). 224–232. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact