Emily York-Crowe

1.4k total citations
16 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Emily York-Crowe is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily York-Crowe has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Clinical Psychology, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Emily York-Crowe's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers). Emily York-Crowe is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers). Emily York-Crowe collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Emily York-Crowe's co-authors include Donald A. Williamson, Marney A. White, Tiffany M. Stewart, Donna H. Ryan, Robert L. Newton, Heather M. Walden, Stewart Gordon, Stephen D. Anton, Corby K. Martin and Éric Ravussin and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Obesity, Health Psychology and British Journal Of Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Emily York-Crowe

16 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily York-Crowe United States 14 625 541 262 211 165 16 1.1k
Linda S. Vara United States 10 815 1.3× 917 1.7× 227 0.9× 286 1.4× 236 1.4× 10 1.5k
Lucene Wisniewski United States 19 880 1.4× 577 1.1× 136 0.5× 136 0.6× 193 1.2× 29 1.3k
Rebecca G. Boswell United States 11 841 1.3× 448 0.8× 97 0.4× 107 0.5× 110 0.7× 21 1.3k
Dawn M. Eichen United States 19 804 1.3× 456 0.8× 76 0.3× 88 0.4× 169 1.0× 55 1.1k
Rachel D. Barnes United States 24 1.1k 1.8× 455 0.8× 78 0.3× 85 0.4× 340 2.1× 63 1.3k
Janet A. Lydecker United States 26 1.4k 2.2× 576 1.1× 151 0.6× 87 0.4× 447 2.7× 94 1.7k
R. Robinson Welch United States 18 1.4k 2.3× 764 1.4× 162 0.6× 83 0.4× 257 1.6× 38 1.8k
Ruth Striegel Weissman United States 13 1.0k 1.6× 411 0.8× 75 0.3× 68 0.3× 258 1.6× 27 1.2k
Deborah R. Glasofer United States 17 1.1k 1.8× 576 1.1× 85 0.3× 72 0.3× 176 1.1× 28 1.3k
Deborah M. Hawker United Kingdom 6 880 1.4× 264 0.5× 66 0.3× 93 0.4× 147 0.9× 6 994

Countries citing papers authored by Emily York-Crowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily York-Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily York-Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily York-Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily York-Crowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily York-Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily York-Crowe. The network helps show where Emily York-Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily York-Crowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily York-Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily York-Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily York-Crowe. Emily York-Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Anton, Stephen D., Corby K. Martin, Leanne M. Redman, et al.. (2008). Psychosocial and behavioral pre-treatment predictors of weight loss outcomes. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 13(1). 30–37. 23 indexed citations
2.
Williamson, Donald A., Corby K. Martin, Stephen D. Anton, et al.. (2008). Is caloric restriction associated with development of eating-disorder symptoms? Results from the CALERIE trial.. Health Psychology. 27(1, Suppl). S32–S42. 45 indexed citations
3.
Martin, Corby K., Stephen D. Anton, Emily York-Crowe, et al.. (2007). Empirical evaluation of the ability to learn a calorie counting system and estimate portion size and food intake. British Journal Of Nutrition. 98(2). 439–444. 28 indexed citations
4.
Martin, Corby K., et al.. (2007). Continuation of weight loss treatment is associated with the number of self-selected treatment modalities.. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy. 3(3). 394–402. 1 indexed citations
5.
Martin, Corby K., Stephen D. Anton, Hongmei Han, et al.. (2007). Examination of Cognitive Function During Six Months of Calorie Restriction: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Rejuvenation Research. 10(2). 179–190. 63 indexed citations
6.
Anton, Stephen D., Heesup Han, Robert L. Newton, et al.. (2006). Reformulation of the Children’s Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT): Factor structure and scoring method in a non-clinical population. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 11(4). 201–210. 21 indexed citations
7.
Newton, Robert L., Anthony Alfonso, Emily York-Crowe, et al.. (2006). Comparison of Body Composition Methods in Obese African‐American Women. Obesity. 14(3). 415–422. 19 indexed citations
8.
Williamson, Donald A., Heather M. Walden, Marney A. White, et al.. (2006). Two‐Year Internet‐Based Randomized Controlled Trial for Weight Loss in African‐American Girls. Obesity. 14(7). 1231–1243. 157 indexed citations
9.
Williamson, Donald A., Corby K. Martin, Emily York-Crowe, et al.. (2006). Measurement of dietary restraint: Validity tests of four questionnaires. Appetite. 48(2). 183–192. 128 indexed citations
10.
York-Crowe, Emily & Deborah A. Williamson. (2005). Health and appearance concerns in young Caucasian and African-American women. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 10(2). e38–e44. 5 indexed citations
11.
Williamson, Donald A., Pamela Davis Martin, Marney A. White, et al.. (2005). Efficacy of an internet-based behavioral weight loss program for overweight adolescent African-American girls. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 10(3). 193–203. 115 indexed citations
12.
York-Crowe, Emily, Marney A. White, Sahasporn Paeratakul, & Donald A. Williamson. (2005). The diet and health knowledge survey: Development of a short interview format. Eating Behaviors. 7(3). 235–242. 13 indexed citations
13.
Newton, Robert L., Marney A. White, Emily York-Crowe, et al.. (2005). Percent body fat measured by BIA and DEXA in obese, African-American adolescent girls. International Journal of Obesity. 29(6). 594–602. 36 indexed citations
14.
Williamson, Donald A., Marney A. White, Emily York-Crowe, & Tiffany M. Stewart. (2004). Cognitive-Behavioral Theories of Eating Disorders. Behavior Modification. 28(6). 711–738. 291 indexed citations
15.
White, Marney A., Pamela Davis Martin, Robert L. Newton, et al.. (2004). Mediators of Weight Loss in a Family‐Based Intervention Presented over the Internet. Obesity Research. 12(7). 1050–1059. 134 indexed citations
16.
Paeratakul, Sahasporn, Emily York-Crowe, Donald A. Williamson, Donna H. Ryan, & George A. Bray. (2002). Americans on Diet. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 102(9). 1247–1251. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026