Emily Waters

443 citations
12 papers · 324 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Waters

12 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Emily Waters
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Applied Psychology 48
  • General Health Professions 133
  • Speech and Hearing 31
  • Literature and Literary Theory 49
  • Communication 29
Replace Joan Wharf-Higgins with:
Joan Wharf-Higgins Canada
Lynda Bergsma United States
Mary Gowin United States
David Judkins United States
Andrea Piesse United States
Laura Struik Canada
Jeffery Chaichana Peterson United States
Roxanne Parrott United States
Laura McCormick United States
Sarah Parvanta United States
Emily Waters relative to Joan Wharf-Higgins Canada Joan Wharf-Higgins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Joan Wharf-Higgins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Waters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Waters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Waters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Waters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Waters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Waters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Waters. The network helps show where Emily Waters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Waters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Waters Line = papers co-authored together Emily Waters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 20222
2 20201
3 20177
4 201717
5 201612
6
Effect of Different Shades of Light on Photosynthesis
20152
7 201345
8
Models for Faculty Development: What Does It Take to be a Community-Engaged Scholar?.
200929
9 200934
10 200843
11 200739
12 200393

About Emily Waters

Emily Waters is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Communication and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (48 citations), General Health Professions (133 citations), Speech and Hearing (31 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations) and Communication (29 citations). Emily Waters has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include David B. Buller, Michael D. Slater, Elaine S. Belansky, Lori A. Crane, Donald E. Zimmerman, Randall Starling, W. Gill Woodall, Laura Saba, Gary Cutter and Julie A. Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion Practice, Progress in community health partnerships, Journal of School Health, Current Issues in Criminal Justice and Journal of Health Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026