Emily Wade

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Emily Wade is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Wade has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily Wade's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). Emily Wade is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). Emily Wade collaborates with scholars based in United States. Emily Wade's co-authors include Eric Stice, Susan Nolen–Hoeksema, Cara Bohon, Heather Shaw, Emily Burton, Paul Rohde, David Huh, Jeff M. Gau, Shawn C. Roll and Shanti Kulkarni and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Emily Wade

7 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Reciprocal relations between rumination and bulimic, subs... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Wade United States 6 949 385 208 182 137 8 1.2k
Jill M. Holm‐Denoma United States 21 1.2k 1.2× 303 0.8× 415 2.0× 183 1.0× 119 0.9× 39 1.4k
Kimberly Zlomke United States 20 718 0.8× 340 0.9× 114 0.5× 205 1.1× 82 0.6× 50 1.2k
Suzanne Broeren Netherlands 20 661 0.7× 325 0.8× 182 0.9× 261 1.4× 71 0.5× 32 1.0k
Kristel Thomassin United States 20 1.0k 1.1× 216 0.6× 168 0.8× 354 1.9× 73 0.5× 48 1.3k
Rachel G. Lucas‐Thompson United States 22 644 0.7× 190 0.5× 243 1.2× 337 1.9× 67 0.5× 80 1.2k
Emily Burton United States 10 852 0.9× 111 0.3× 294 1.4× 162 0.9× 143 1.0× 11 951
Barbara Hoff Esbjørn Denmark 18 1.0k 1.1× 426 1.1× 215 1.0× 356 2.0× 68 0.5× 56 1.2k
Nicholas R. Farrell United States 18 1.0k 1.1× 532 1.4× 108 0.5× 180 1.0× 152 1.1× 33 1.3k
Jill T. Ehrenreich United States 17 853 0.9× 366 1.0× 120 0.6× 174 1.0× 73 0.5× 27 976
Caroline E. Kerns United States 14 841 0.9× 310 0.8× 180 0.9× 252 1.4× 161 1.2× 20 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Wade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Wade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Wade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Wade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Wade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Wade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Wade. The network helps show where Emily Wade may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Wade

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Wade. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Wade based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Wade. Emily Wade is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Roll, Shawn C., et al.. (2018). Linking Research to Practice in Hand Therapy: A Mapping Review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 31(1). 144–145.
2.
Wade, Emily, et al.. (2017). Hand therapy interventions, outcomes, and diagnoses evaluated over the last 10 years: A mapping review linking research to practice. Journal of Hand Therapy. 32(1). 1–9. 32 indexed citations
3.
Stice, Eric, et al.. (2013). Effectiveness of peer-led dissonance-based eating disorder prevention groups: Results from two randomized pilot trials. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 51(4-5). 197–206. 55 indexed citations
4.
Kulkarni, Shanti, et al.. (2011). Views on Parent–Child Connectedness Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Parents of High-Risk Youth. Journal of Family Social Work. 14(5). 407–428. 3 indexed citations
5.
Stice, Eric, Paul Rohde, Jeff M. Gau, & Emily Wade. (2010). Efficacy trial of a brief cognitive–behavioral depression prevention program for high-risk adolescents: Effects at 1- and 2-year follow-up.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 78(6). 856–867. 110 indexed citations
6.
Nolen–Hoeksema, Susan, Eric Stice, Emily Wade, & Cara Bohon. (2007). Reciprocal relations between rumination and bulimic, substance abuse, and depressive symptoms in female adolescents.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 116(1). 198–207. 528 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Stice, Eric, Heather Shaw, Emily Burton, & Emily Wade. (2006). Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: A randomized efficacy trial.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 74(2). 263–275. 304 indexed citations
8.
Huh, David, et al.. (2006). Does Problem Behavior Elicit Poor Parenting?. Journal of Adolescent Research. 21(2). 185–204. 135 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026