Emily P. Friedman

21 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Emily P. Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 202
  • Artificial Intelligence 169
  • Computer Networks and Communications 40
  • Molecular Biology 29
  • General Health Professions 21
Replace Olivier Raynaud with:
Olivier Raynaud France
Ferenc Gécseg Hungary
Celia Wrathall United States
Dung T. Huynh United States
Gerd Wechsung Germany
David Wolfe United States
Joel Berman United States
William F. Ogden United States
D. A. Wolfram Australia
Omri Weinstein United States
Emily P. Friedman relative to Olivier Raynaud France Olivier Raynaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Olivier Raynaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily P. Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily P. Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily P. Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily P. Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily P. Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily P. Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily P. Friedman. The network helps show where Emily P. Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily P. Friedman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily P. Friedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily P. Friedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily P. Friedman. Emily P. Friedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 3
3 7
4 12
5 10
6
An ethic for all of us.
1
7 2
8 11
9 20
10 3
11 8
12
Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
57
13 6
14 33
15
Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
24
16 42
17
Proceedings of the eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
20
18 5
19 5
20 17

About Emily P. Friedman

Emily P. Friedman is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (11 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (8 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (202 citations), Artificial Intelligence (169 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (8 citations). Emily P. Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sheila A. Greibach, Michael A. Harrison, Richard J. Lipton, Walter J. Savitch, John E. Hopcroft, Detlef Wotschke, Sara E. Benjamin‐Neelon, Ashok K. Chandra, Karen Gardner and Samantha J. Butler. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Nutrients and Journal of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026