Emily McGrath

467 total citations
10 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Emily McGrath is a scholar working on Ecology, Biotechnology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily McGrath has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Biotechnology and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Emily McGrath's work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (6 papers) and Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (3 papers). Emily McGrath is often cited by papers focused on Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (6 papers) and Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (3 papers). Emily McGrath collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Indonesia. Emily McGrath's co-authors include James J. Bell, Andrew Biggerstaff, Megan Shaffer, Holly Bennett, César A. Cárdenas, Jamaluddin Jompa, Michele Caggana, David J. Smith, Norma P. Tavakoli and Melissa B. Pearce and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Conservation Biology and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

In The Last Decade

Emily McGrath

10 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily McGrath New Zealand 9 180 158 82 52 44 10 296
Didier M. de Bakker Netherlands 9 290 1.6× 92 0.6× 148 1.8× 182 3.5× 25 0.6× 18 350
Megan Shaffer New Zealand 8 201 1.1× 147 0.9× 81 1.0× 59 1.1× 29 0.7× 20 251
R. P. WALKER United States 6 42 0.2× 184 1.2× 46 0.6× 41 0.8× 39 0.9× 9 383
Jon Thomassen Hestetun Norway 11 206 1.1× 129 0.8× 81 1.0× 86 1.7× 110 2.5× 21 306
D. A. Abdo Australia 11 274 1.5× 218 1.4× 139 1.7× 117 2.3× 27 0.6× 14 427
Holly Bennett New Zealand 7 185 1.0× 171 1.1× 58 0.7× 54 1.0× 15 0.3× 9 248
Michelle Achlatis Australia 11 265 1.5× 172 1.1× 102 1.2× 132 2.5× 18 0.4× 13 336
Anthony R. Russo United States 11 229 1.3× 83 0.5× 141 1.7× 229 4.4× 16 0.4× 27 403
Francesca Strano New Zealand 11 184 1.0× 92 0.6× 111 1.4× 111 2.1× 25 0.6× 24 265
Teresa Morganti Spain 8 144 0.8× 172 1.1× 55 0.7× 40 0.8× 15 0.3× 11 245

Countries citing papers authored by Emily McGrath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily McGrath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily McGrath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily McGrath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily McGrath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily McGrath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily McGrath. The network helps show where Emily McGrath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily McGrath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily McGrath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily McGrath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily McGrath. Emily McGrath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Bell, James J., Emily McGrath, Megan Shaffer, et al.. (2020). Interocean patterns in shallow water sponge assemblage structure and function. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 95(6). 1720–1758. 25 indexed citations
2.
McGrath, Emily, Lisa Woods, Jamaluddin Jompa, Abdul Haris, & James J. Bell. (2018). Growth and longevity in giant barrel sponges: Redwoods of the reef or Pines in the Indo-Pacific?. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 15317–15317. 10 indexed citations
3.
Bell, James J., et al.. (2017). Sponge monitoring: Moving beyond diversity and abundance measures. Ecological Indicators. 78. 470–488. 31 indexed citations
4.
McGrath, Emily, David J. Smith, Jamaluddin Jompa, & James J. Bell. (2017). Adaptive mechanisms and physiological effects of suspended and settled sediment on barrel sponges. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 496. 74–83. 20 indexed citations
5.
Pearce, Melissa B., et al.. (2016). Newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia in New York State. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports. 7. 1–7. 28 indexed citations
6.
Bell, James J., et al.. (2015). Sediment impacts on marine sponges. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 94(1-2). 5–13. 99 indexed citations
7.
Kay, Denise M., Melissa B. Pearce, Emily McGrath, et al.. (2015). Screening for cystic fibrosis in New York State: considerations for algorithm improvements. European Journal of Pediatrics. 175(2). 181–193. 26 indexed citations
8.
Bell, James J., et al.. (2015). Global conservation status of sponges. Conservation Biology. 29(1). 42–53. 47 indexed citations
9.
Pangilinan, Faith, Anne M. Molloy, James L. Mills, et al.. (2014). Replication and exploratory analysis of 24 candidate risk polymorphisms for neural tube defects. BMC Medical Genetics. 15(1). 102–102. 9 indexed citations
10.
McGrath, Emily. (2012). The Feasibility of Bubble-Binding Sponge Propagation for Use in Reef Restoration. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026