Emily Matthews

892 total citations
10 papers, 604 citations indexed

About

Emily Matthews is a scholar working on Ecology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Matthews has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 604 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Ecology, 2 papers in Plant Science and 1 paper in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Emily Matthews's work include Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (1 paper) and Skin and Cellular Biology Research (1 paper). Emily Matthews is often cited by papers focused on Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (1 paper) and Skin and Cellular Biology Research (1 paper). Emily Matthews collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and Australia. Emily Matthews's co-authors include Walter Hüttler, Ester van der Voet, Stefan Bringezu, René Kleijn, Marina Fischer‐Kowalski, Helga Weisz, Helmut Schütz, Heinz Schandl, Eric Rodenburg and Christof Amann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, FEBS Journal and Computers & Chemical Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Emily Matthews

10 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Emily Matthews
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Environmental Engineering 205
  • Global and Planetary Change 137
  • Ecology 124
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 74
  • Economics and Econometrics 70
Replace Christopher Green with:
Christopher Green United Kingdom
Tanja Myllyviita Finland
Peng Kang China
Lauri Hetemäki Finland
Walter Pengue Argentina
Peiming Zheng China
Graham Watkins United States
Julie Witcover United States
Paco Melià Italy
Peter Schwarzbauer Austria
Christopher Green United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily Matthews
Emily Matthews · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily Matthews
Emily Matthews · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Matthews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Matthews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Matthews. The network helps show where Emily Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Matthews

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Matthews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Matthews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Matthews. Emily Matthews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 8
3 11
4 9
5 14
6 51
7
The state of the forest: Indonesia.
138
8
Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: forest ecosystems.
72
9
The Weight of Nations : Material Outflows from Industrial Economies
291
10
Weight of Nations
3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026