Emily Lauer

28 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Emily Lauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Speech and Hearing 57
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 27
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 195
  • Safety Research 51
  • Clinical Psychology 101
Replace Lisa O’Leary with:
Lisa O’Leary United Kingdom
Lyn McPherson Australia
Jasmina Sisirak United States
Lawrence T. Force United States
Elisabeth L. Zeilinger Austria
Joanne Wilkinson United States
Indermeet Sawhney United Kingdom
Edeanya Agbese United States
Mairead Moloney Ireland
Kathleen J.H. Sparbel United States
Emily Lauer relative to Lisa O’Leary United Kingdom Lisa O’Leary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lisa O’Leary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Lauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Lauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Lauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Lauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Lauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Lauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Lauer. The network helps show where Emily Lauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Lauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Lauer Line = papers co-authored together Emily Lauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015104
2 201845
3 201140
4 201840
5 201930
6 202023
7
2016 Annual Disability Statistics Compendium.
201722
8 201519
9 201414
10 202014
11 201911
12 202110
13 20209
14 20197
15 20196
16 20185
17 20225
18 20244
19 20213
20 20223

About Emily Lauer

Emily Lauer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Emergency Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (15 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (13 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers) and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (57 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (27 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (195 citations), Safety Research (51 citations) and Clinical Psychology (101 citations). Emily Lauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philip McCallion, Andrew J. Houtenville, Pauline Heslop, Elizabeth T. Momany, Suzanne McDermott, Joanne Wilkinson, Amy K. Rosen, Karen M. Freund, Julie A. Royer and Scott D. Lindgren. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and health journal, Intellectual and developmental disabilities, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact