Emily L. Smith

565 total citations
27 papers, 391 citations indexed

About

Emily L. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily L. Smith has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 391 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Clinical Psychology, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Emily L. Smith's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers). Emily L. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers). Emily L. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Uganda. Emily L. Smith's co-authors include Shevaun D. Neupert, Ann Pearman, MacKenzie Hughes, Jennifer A. Bellingtier, Gale Burford, Joan Pennell, Denis J. Marcellin‐Little, Ola Harrysson, Alan Meca and Robert J. Cramer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Developmental Biology and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Emily L. Smith

21 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Emily L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Clinical Psychology 242
  • Social Psychology 120
  • General Health Professions 101
  • Health 96
  • Sociology and Political Science 44
Replace Fugui Li with:
Fugui Li China
Cristina Noriega Spain
Cristina Velasco Spain
Kendal Orgera United States
Tina L. Rochelle Hong Kong
Raquel Bosó Pérez United Kingdom
Catharina van der Boor United Kingdom
Derya Adıbelli Türkiye
Mark Bosmans Netherlands
Gabriel Nudelman Israel
Fugui Li China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily L. Smith
Emily L. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily L. Smith
Emily L. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily L. Smith. The network helps show where Emily L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily L. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily L. Smith. Emily L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 7
5 2
6 1
7 8
8 9
9 3
10 5
11 96
12 6
13 173
14 16
15 12
16 16
17 4
18 10
19 6
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026