Emily J. Miner
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Todd K. ShackelfordValerie G. StarrattAaron T. GoetzFarnaz KaighobadiWilliam F. McKibbinColin J. BeckHillard KaplanSteven J. C. Gaulin
- Topics
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers)Marriage and Sexual Relationships (4 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Emily J. Miner
15 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 247
- Sociology and Political Science 215
- Clinical Psychology 123
- Social Psychology 73
- Health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Miner
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Miner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Miner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Miner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Miner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Miner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Miner. The network helps show where Emily J. Miner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Miner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Miner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Miner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Miner. Emily J. Miner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | Who Gets Designated a Terrorist and Why | 0 |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | Mate attraction, retention and expulsion. | 15 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 85 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 32 |
About Emily J. Miner
Emily J. Miner is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (4 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (247 citations), Health (59 citations) and Clinical Psychology (123 citations). Emily J. Miner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Todd K. Shackelford, Valerie G. Starratt, Aaron T. Goetz, Farnaz Kaighobadi, William F. McKibbin, Colin J. Beck, Hillard Kaplan, Steven J. C. Gaulin, Michael Gurven and Viviana A. Weekes‐Shackelford. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS Biology and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.