Emily J. Cox

53 total papers · 842 total citations
31 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

Emily J. Cox is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily J. Cox has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 5 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Emily J. Cox's work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers). Emily J. Cox is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers). Emily J. Cox collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Emily J. Cox's co-authors include Susan A. Marsh, Radica Z. Alicic, Katherine R. Tuttle, Joshua J. Neumiller, Mary F. Paine, James M. Scanlan, Jeannine S. McCune, Jashvant D. Unadkat, Allan E. Rettie and Gabriela I. Patilea‐Vrana and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Emily J. Cox

31 papers receiving 583 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily J. Cox 150 119 87 72 70 31 588
Takahiro Yamaji 103 0.7× 127 1.1× 37 0.4× 77 1.1× 72 1.0× 28 496
Tetsuhiro Kubota 198 1.3× 105 0.9× 47 0.5× 99 1.4× 31 0.4× 37 570
Liping Zhu 124 0.8× 43 0.4× 65 0.7× 54 0.8× 51 0.7× 32 516
Nur Samsu 206 1.4× 137 1.2× 37 0.4× 50 0.7× 61 0.9× 25 672
Andrea Schreiber 189 1.3× 107 0.9× 41 0.5× 112 1.6× 64 0.9× 25 626
Paulina Gorzelak‐Pabiś 154 1.0× 155 1.3× 48 0.6× 94 1.3× 207 3.0× 46 620
Sanket Patel 146 1.0× 127 1.1× 63 0.7× 198 2.8× 41 0.6× 35 500
Gabriella di Mauro 104 0.7× 112 0.9× 63 0.7× 83 1.2× 91 1.3× 32 656
J. A. Jansen 88 0.6× 47 0.4× 118 1.4× 53 0.7× 79 1.1× 30 656
Ivan Cancarevic 110 0.7× 83 0.7× 43 0.5× 35 0.5× 48 0.7× 47 515

Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Cox. The network helps show where Emily J. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Cox. Emily J. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026