Emily Glorney

451 total citations
28 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Emily Glorney is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Glorney has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Clinical Psychology, 8 papers in Health and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Glorney's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers). Emily Glorney is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers). Emily Glorney collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Mexico. Emily Glorney's co-authors include Graham Thornicroft, Steve Wright, Kevin Gournay, Silvia Fraga Domínguez, Jennifer E. Storey, Derek Perkins, Tamsin Higgs, Adam J. Carter, Hannah Lena Merdian and Sara da Silva Ramos and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Aggression and Violent Behavior and Trauma Violence & Abuse.

In The Last Decade

Emily Glorney

21 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Emily Glorney
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Clinical Psychology 184
  • Sociology and Political Science 80
  • Epidemiology 70
  • Demography 60
  • General Health Professions 57
Replace Lisieux Elaine de Borba Telles with:
Lisieux Elaine de Borba Telles Brazil
Helene Jackson United States
William J. Warnken United States
Virginia M. Newton United States
Tammi Walker United Kingdom
E. Broekaert Belgium
Allison L. Rodriguez United States
James E. McCarroll United States
Susanne N. Biehle United States
April A. Gerlock United States
Lisieux Elaine de Borba Telles Brazil View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily Glorney
Emily Glorney · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily Glorney
Emily Glorney · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Glorney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Glorney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Glorney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Glorney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Glorney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Glorney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Glorney. The network helps show where Emily Glorney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Glorney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Glorney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Glorney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Glorney. Emily Glorney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 1
6 2
7 1
8 0
9 6
10 4
11 6
12 1
13 5
14 21
15 2
16 30
17
Promoting ethical behaviour and preventing wrongdoing in organisations: A rapid evidence assessment
3
18 2
19 31
20 69

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026