Emily Gaarder

938 total citations
12 papers, 490 citations indexed

About

Emily Gaarder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Gaarder has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 490 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Emily Gaarder's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers). Emily Gaarder is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers). Emily Gaarder collaborates with scholars based in United States. Emily Gaarder's co-authors include Jennifer K. Wesely, Joanne Belknap, Marjorie S. Zatz, Nancy Rodríguez and Lois Presser and has published in prestigious journals such as Criminology, Gender & Society and Justice Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Emily Gaarder

12 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Gaarder United States	9	336	182	81	79	74	12	490
Nicole Nicotera United States	13	167 0.5×	153 0.8×	106 1.3×	81 1.0×	152 2.1×	42	587
Jennifer K. Wesely United States	11	354 1.1×	151 0.8×	62 0.8×	96 1.2×	105 1.4×	32	545
Keri B. Burchfield United States	14	557 1.7×	260 1.4×	80 1.0×	38 0.5×	190 2.6×	19	685
Colin Tatz Australia	14	270 0.8×	116 0.6×	161 2.0×	81 1.0×	68 0.9×	60	542
Regina M. Bures United States	13	303 0.9×	75 0.4×	145 1.8×	67 0.8×	125 1.7×	23	651
David Tacey Australia	8	153 0.5×	92 0.5×	175 2.2×	110 1.4×	32 0.4×	40	439
Abigail Bray Australia	12	163 0.5×	179 1.0×	178 2.2×	39 0.5×	117 1.6×	28	517
Daniel McDonald United States	8	357 1.1×	60 0.3×	36 0.4×	207 2.6×	167 2.3×	24	601
Beverly L. Stiles United States	11	260 0.8×	178 1.0×	52 0.6×	126 1.6×	42 0.6×	18	463
Barrik van Winkle United States	7	869 2.6×	86 0.5×	127 1.6×	71 0.9×	251 3.4×	8	986

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Gaarder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Gaarder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Gaarder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Gaarder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Gaarder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Gaarder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Gaarder. The network helps show where Emily Gaarder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Gaarder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Gaarder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Gaarder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Gaarder. Emily Gaarder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Gaarder, Emily. (2019). Women and the Animal Rights Movement. Rutgers University Press eBooks. 16 indexed citations

2.

Gaarder, Emily. (2015). Lessons from a restorative circles initiative for intimate partner violence. 3(3). 342–367. 12 indexed citations

3.

Gaarder, Emily, et al.. (2012). Connecting restorative justice with gender-responsive programming. Contemporary Justice Review. 15(3). 239–264. 4 indexed citations

4.

Gaarder, Emily. (2011). Where the Boys Aren't: The Predominance of Women in Animal Rights Activism. Feminist formations. 23(2). 54–76. 31 indexed citations

5.

Gaarder, Emily. (2008). Risk & Reward: The Impact of Animal Rights Activism on Women. Society and Animals. 16(1). 1–22. 17 indexed citations

6.

Presser, Lois, et al.. (2007). Imagining Restorative Justice beyond Recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 46(1-2). 163–176. 1 indexed citations

7.

Gaarder, Emily, Nancy Rodríguez, & Marjorie S. Zatz. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers' views of girls. Justice Quarterly. 21(3). 547–578. 128 indexed citations

8.

Wesely, Jennifer K. & Emily Gaarder. (2004). The Gendered “Nature” of the Urban Outdoors. Gender & Society. 18(5). 645–663. 125 indexed citations

9.

Gaarder, Emily & Joanne Belknap. (2004). Little Women. Women & Criminal Justice. 15(2). 51–80. 15 indexed citations

10.

Gaarder, Emily & Joanne Belknap. (2002). TENUOUS BORDERS: GIRLS TRANSFERRED TO ADULT COURT*. Criminology. 40(3). 481–517. 87 indexed citations

11.

Presser, Lois & Emily Gaarder. (2000). Can Restorative Justice Reduce Battering? Some Preliminary Considerations. Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order. 27(1). 175. 49 indexed citations

12.

Gaarder, Emily. (2000). Gender Politics: The Focus on Women in the Memory Debates. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 9(1). 91–106. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact