Emily Ford

100 total papers · 664 total citations
28 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Emily Ford is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Information Systems and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Ford has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Pharmacology, 3 papers in Information Systems and 3 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Emily Ford's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers). Emily Ford is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers). Emily Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Emily Ford's co-authors include Anusch Yazdani, Ben Kroon, Simon McDowell, Demián Glujovsky, Roger Hart, Brittany Wong, Dawn M. Richardson, Betty T. Izumi, Keith Harrison and Jon Adams and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Emily Ford

25 papers receiving 305 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily Ford 116 115 51 49 41 28 324
Amy G. Cox 66 0.6× 11 0.1× 25 0.5× 8 0.2× 7 0.2× 23 304
Vivian Lewis 103 0.9× 60 0.5× 21 0.4× 1 0.0× 78 1.9× 25 350
Rachel Cusatis 50 0.4× 22 0.2× 33 0.6× 29 0.7× 33 350
Rishita Nandagiri 88 0.8× 42 0.4× 52 1.0× 38 0.9× 17 350
Amir Tiyuri 33 0.3× 71 0.6× 9 0.2× 9 0.2× 27 264
Lorenzo Del Savio 75 0.6× 10 0.1× 32 0.6× 2 0.0× 7 0.2× 21 238
Daniel Rodger 94 0.8× 73 0.6× 43 0.8× 6 0.1× 50 347
Melinda Baldwin 25 0.2× 3 0.0× 7 0.1× 77 1.6× 16 0.4× 23 306
Kari Baldwin 153 1.3× 8 0.1× 3 0.1× 13 0.3× 12 0.3× 24 258
Jessica Borg 141 1.2× 107 0.9× 7 0.1× 3 0.1× 4 0.1× 20 285

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Ford. The network helps show where Emily Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Ford. Emily Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026