Emily E. Hohman

926 citations
47 papers · 653 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Emily E. Hohman

45 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

Emily E. Hohman
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 307
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 155
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 77
  • Pharmacy 48
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 108
Replace Jillian Trabulsi with:
Jillian Trabulsi United States
J Eaton-Evans United Kingdom
Julie Obbagy United States
Harunobu Nakamura Japan
Nadina Karaolis‐Danckert Germany
Marta Cuervo Spain
A K Norimah Malaysia
Jesús M. Garagorri Spain
Anja Moß Germany
Manjiang Yao United States
Emily E. Hohman relative to Jillian Trabulsi United States Jillian Trabulsi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Jillian Trabulsi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Hohman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Hohman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Hohman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Hohman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Hohman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Hohman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Hohman. The network helps show where Emily E. Hohman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Hohman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Hohman Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Hohman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20248
2 20240
3 20233
4 20233
5 20232
6 20231
7 20224
8 20227
9 20207
10 20203
11 202023
12 201917
13 201812
14 201810
15 201829
16 20182
17 20185
18 20178
19 201427
20
Vitamin D bread could help solve insufficiency problem
20112

About Emily E. Hohman

Emily E. Hohman is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 47 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (23 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (13 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (11 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (9 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (8 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (307 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (155 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (77 citations), Pharmacy (48 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (108 citations). Emily E. Hohman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer S. Savage, Leann L. Birch, Ian M. Paul, Connie M. Weaver, Michele E. Marini, Danielle Symons Downs, Berdine R. Martin, James C. Fleet, Mário G. Ferruzzi and Daniel E. Rivera. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Academic Pediatrics, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal of Nutrition and Obesity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026