Emily C. Ogburn

545 total citations
11 papers, 211 citations indexed

About

Emily C. Ogburn is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily C. Ogburn has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 211 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 9 papers in Insect Science and 5 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Emily C. Ogburn's work include Hemiptera Insect Studies (9 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers) and Insects and Parasite Interactions (5 papers). Emily C. Ogburn is often cited by papers focused on Hemiptera Insect Studies (9 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers) and Insects and Parasite Interactions (5 papers). Emily C. Ogburn collaborates with scholars based in United States. Emily C. Ogburn's co-authors include J. F. Walgenbach, Anne L. Nielsen, John Pote, Jennifer L. Moore, Clarissa R. Mathews, Celeste Welty, Matthew J. Grieshop, Mary Rogers, R. T. Bessin and Kim A. Hoelmer and has published in prestigious journals such as Pest Management Science, Journal of Parasitology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

In The Last Decade

Emily C. Ogburn

10 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily C. Ogburn United States 8 177 166 65 33 31 11 211
Greg Krawczyk United States 10 174 1.0× 216 1.3× 41 0.6× 35 1.1× 36 1.2× 17 260
Megan V. Herlihy United States 6 325 1.8× 320 1.9× 65 1.0× 32 1.0× 30 1.0× 9 349
Bryan Butler United States 5 283 1.6× 292 1.8× 114 1.8× 65 2.0× 35 1.1× 6 345
Denise Wyniger Switzerland 9 351 2.0× 277 1.7× 127 2.0× 40 1.2× 62 2.0× 17 374
Angelita L. Acebes‐Doria United States 11 253 1.4× 281 1.7× 94 1.4× 67 2.0× 40 1.3× 26 334
Ken Funayama Japan 11 277 1.6× 296 1.8× 126 1.9× 71 2.2× 43 1.4× 34 350
Judith M. Stahl United States 11 321 1.8× 374 2.3× 60 0.9× 50 1.5× 37 1.2× 22 405
Christine Dieckhoff United States 10 494 2.8× 510 3.1× 97 1.5× 66 2.0× 43 1.4× 13 546
Fedor V. Konstantinov Russia 10 321 1.8× 246 1.5× 34 0.5× 95 2.9× 50 1.6× 58 370
C. Scott Bundy United States 11 320 1.8× 315 1.9× 65 1.0× 94 2.8× 52 1.7× 34 394

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Ogburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Ogburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Ogburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Ogburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Ogburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Ogburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Ogburn. The network helps show where Emily C. Ogburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Ogburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Ogburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Ogburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Ogburn. Emily C. Ogburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Whipps, Christopher M., Emily C. Ogburn, & William F. Font. (2025). A New Myxidium Species from the Least Killifish Heterandria formosa in Louisiana. Journal of Parasitology. 111(2). 163–171.
3.
McDougall, Robert, Emily C. Ogburn, J. F. Walgenbach, & Anne L. Nielsen. (2021). Diapause Termination in Invasive Populations of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Response to Photoperiod. Environmental Entomology. 50(6). 1400–1406. 8 indexed citations
6.
Ogburn, Emily C. & J. F. Walgenbach. (2019). Impact of Temperature Storage Conditions of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Eggs on Parasitism by Anastatus reduvii (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 113(1). 98–107. 6 indexed citations
8.
Morrison, William R., Angelita L. Acebes‐Doria, Emily C. Ogburn, et al.. (2017). Behavioral Response of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to Semiochemicals Deployed Inside and Outside Anthropogenic Structures During the Overwintering Period. Journal of Economic Entomology. 110(3). 1002–1009. 20 indexed citations
9.
Nielsen, Anne L., Shelby J. Fleischer, George C. Hamilton, et al.. (2017). Phenology of brown marmorated stink bug described using female reproductive development. Ecology and Evolution. 7(17). 6680–6690. 40 indexed citations
10.
Mathews, Clarissa R., Brett R. Blaauw, Galen P. Dively, et al.. (2017). Evaluating a polyculture trap crop for organic management of Halyomorpha halys and native stink bugs in peppers. Journal of Pest Science. 90(4). 1245–1255. 26 indexed citations
11.
Ogburn, Emily C., R. T. Bessin, Christine Dieckhoff, et al.. (2016). Natural enemy impact on eggs of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in organic agroecosystems: A regional assessment. Biological Control. 101. 39–51. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026