Emily Attree

944 total citations · 2 hit papers
5 papers, 442 citations indexed

About

Emily Attree is a scholar working on Neurology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Attree has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 442 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Neurology, 3 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily Attree's work include Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). Emily Attree is often cited by papers focused on Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). Emily Attree collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Denmark. Emily Attree's co-authors include Melissa Heightman, Mark Gabbay, Amitava Banerjee, Rajarshi Banerjee, Michael G. Crooks, Daniel J. Cuthbertson, Lyth Hishmeh, Andrea Dennis, Dan Wootton and Jude A. Oben and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Emily Attree

5 papers receiving 427 citations

Hit Papers

Multiorgan impairment in low-risk individuals with post-C... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 2023 100 200 300

Peers

Emily Attree
Emily Attree
Citations per year, relative to Emily Attree Emily Attree (= 1×) peers José‐Manuel León‐Ramírez

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Attree

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Attree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Attree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Attree more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Attree

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Attree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Attree. The network helps show where Emily Attree may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Attree

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Attree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Attree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Attree. Emily Attree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
1.
Dennis, Andrea, Daniel J. Cuthbertson, Dan Wootton, et al.. (2023). Multi-organ impairment and long COVID: a 1-year prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 116(3). 97–112. 59 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M. van der, et al.. (2023). Integrated care pathways: a new approach for integrated care systems. British Journal of General Practice. 73(734). 422–422. 13 indexed citations
5.
Dennis, Andrea, Małgorzata Wamil, Jude A. Oben, et al.. (2021). Multiorgan impairment in low-risk individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a prospective, community-based study. BMJ Open. 11(3). e048391–e048391. 345 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026