Emily Adlam

24 papers receiving 162 citations

Peers

Emily Adlam
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • History and Philosophy of Science 75
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 164
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 36
  • Artificial Intelligence 79
  • Theoretical Computer Science 2
Replace Gábor Hofer‐Szabó with:
Gábor Hofer‐Szabó Hungary
Christopher G. Timpson United Kingdom
Flavio Del Santo Austria
Gino Tarozzi Italy
Dustin Lazarovici Switzerland
Peter Gibbins United Kingdom
Ward Struyve Belgium
Dominik Rauch Austria
Raymond Lal United Kingdom
Sinem Binicioǧlu Türkiye
Emily Adlam relative to Gábor Hofer‐Szabó Hungary Gábor Hofer‐Szabó's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Gábor Hofer‐Szabó · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Adlam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Adlam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Adlam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Adlam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Adlam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Adlam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Adlam. The network helps show where Emily Adlam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Emily Adlam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Adlam Line = papers co-authored together Emily Adlam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201830
2 201525
3 202321
4 202216
5 202115
6 202213
7 201811
8 201611
9 20229
10 20247
11 20235
12 20225
13 20225
14 20234
15 20243
16 20252
17 20242
18 20232
19 20251
20 20241

About Emily Adlam

Emily Adlam is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Physiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (24 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (6 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (75 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (164 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (36 citations), Artificial Intelligence (79 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Emily Adlam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Kent, Carlo Rovelli, T. N. Palmer, Niels Linnemann, James Read, Sabine Hossenfelder and Michael Ridley. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophy of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, European Journal for Philosophy of Science and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact