565 total citations 13 papers, 234 citations indexed
About
Emilio Sereni is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Marketing.
According to data from OpenAlex, Emilio Sereni has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 234 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 1 paper in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Emilio Sereni's work include Diverse academic and cultural studies (4 papers), Historical and Environmental Studies (4 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers). Emilio Sereni is often cited by papers focused on Diverse academic and cultural studies (4 papers), Historical and Environmental Studies (4 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers). Emilio Sereni collaborates with scholars based in . Emilio Sereni's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Economic History Review and Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales.
This map shows the geographic impact of Emilio Sereni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emilio Sereni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emilio Sereni more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emilio Sereni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emilio Sereni. The network helps show where Emilio Sereni may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.